search for: apsl

..., and I wanted to plot the orginal values with the estimated one. Unfortunately I can only see the original values. Below is the code with data library: / library(forecast) data(AirPassengers) AP <- AirPassengers class(AP) start(AP) end(AP) frequency(AP) lgAP <- log(AP) t<-2:length(AP) APsL<-log(ts(lgAP, start=1949, frequency=12)) final<-(ts.intersect(lgAP,lgAPlag=lag(lgAP,-1), t=t, sin12 = sin(2*pi*t/12), cos12 = cos(2*pi*t/12),dframe=TRUE)) summary(AIRlm <- lm(lgAP ~ lgAPlag + t + sin12 + cos12, data=final)) plot(lgAP, main="Log of Air Passengers",type=&quot...

OpenSSH Unix Dev, Mac OS X 10.5 recently shipped with OpenSSH 4.5p1. This build includes a number of patches, some general bug fixes and some platform- specific fixes and enhancements. These patches are available from our open source site (http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5/OpenSSH-87/ ). Following is a brief description of each patch. We'd be more than happy to

Hello everyone, This email is a continuation of a discussion from almost a year ago, started back here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-October/091536.html As described in that email, this is a complicated topic and deals with sensitive legal issues. I am not a lawyer, and this email is not intended to be legal advice in the formal sense. That said, I have spoken with many

...de requires root privileges; enter your password when prompted. The '-n' option to mv makes sure that you don't overwrite a (newer) installed version. NOTE: copyfile.h is *NOT* licensed under the GPL, but rather under the Apple Public Source Licence (http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl). You may want to review this license; I Am Not A Lawyer so I cannot say and will not speculate on how this affects your rights. 4) Unpack the rsync source, and apply the patches. In the Terminal: tar zxf rsync-2.6.3.tar.gz cd rsync-2.6.3 patch -p0 < ../EA.diff patch -p0 < ../...

...quot;unquestionable good”? If we don’t achieve this, then we run the heightened risk of someone being sued for using LLVM. This isn’t good for the community. > (3) Revocation of copyright and patent use permissions in case of > litigation. I think this is the part about a potential move to APSL2 > that is most highly contented. That isn’t my impression. Everyone that I have spoken to is in favor of the patent termination clauses (including the FSF: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html#apache2). The only complexity I’ve heard is that it introduces is a potential compat...

...t away from it. By maintaining Darwin core compatibility your code will remain valuable as the marketplace and industry continues to evolve (trust me here), particularly as DRM-related problems continue to come forward. Of course, that means releasing your source code under a FOSS license, such as APSL. Darwin OS is a free and open source operating system that is not going away, so try to focus your coding towards supporting that standard instead of proprietary software. Here is the essence of the current problem with Darwin OS. Apple replaced working boot code with the following proprietary d...

...t away from it. By maintaining Darwin core compatibility your code will remain valuable as the marketplace and industry continues to evolve (trust me here), particularly as DRM-related problems continue to come forward. Of course, that means releasing your source code under a FOSS license, such as APSL. Darwin OS is a free and open source operating system that is not going away, so try to focus your coding towards supporting that standard instead of proprietary software. Here is the essence of the current problem with Darwin OS. Apple replaced working boot code with the following proprietary d...

...t away from it. By maintaining Darwin core compatibility your code will remain valuable as the marketplace and industry continues to evolve (trust me here), particularly as DRM-related problems continue to come forward. Of course, that means releasing your source code under a FOSS license, such as APSL. Darwin OS is a free and open source operating system that is not going away, so try to focus your coding towards supporting that standard instead of proprietary software. Here is the essence of the current problem with Darwin OS. Apple replaced working boot code with the following proprietary d...

...t away from it. By maintaining Darwin core compatibility your code will remain valuable as the marketplace and industry continues to evolve (trust me here), particularly as DRM-related problems continue to come forward. Of course, that means releasing your source code under a FOSS license, such as APSL. Darwin OS is a free and open source operating system that is not going away, so try to focus your coding towards supporting that standard instead of proprietary software. Here is the essence of the current problem with Darwin OS. Apple replaced working boot code with the following proprietary d...

I intend to release a project I wrote with Rails. What is the right licensing scheme for a web application (content managing system) which could grow with plugins and add-ons ? Personally, I would prefer the GPL but does that mean any add-on to the CMS (like task management) will have to be GPL ? If some people contribute to the code could it still be double-licenced so that the people who