search for: apremda

I''m having problems knowing what a scenario outline I''ve created is doing. In particular I have no idea about what steps are being matched when the outline is run so when I break something I can''t find out what is wrong. Is there any progress on getting better output for scenario outlines. TIA Andrew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Aslak Helles?y <aslak.hellesoy at gmail.com>wrote: > When (if) this thread ends, let''s start a discussion about indentation > conventions! > Oh... let the pleasure be mine!... and why wait? _EVERYONE_ knows that the only way to indent ruby code is 2 plain spaces. Tabs are known to be the source of all evil and 4 spaces obviously wastes

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Andrew Premdas <apremdas at gmail.com> wrote: > Currently I have a very simple constants implementation being loaded as a > Rails initialiser > > module MVOR > ? module Postage > ??? THRESHOLD = BigDecimal.new(''6.99'') > ??? RATE = BigDecimal.new(''30.00'') > ? e...

I am working with the authlogic gem and trying to create a simple login test from cucumber features. The feature statement is: Given the user is not logged in The step definition for this is confounding me. In the application_controller the authlogic tutorial recommends the following: private def require_user unless current_user store_location flash[:notice] =

Is there any way to do foo.should (be_nil || be_empty) in rspec. Thanks in advance -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rspec-users/attachments/20081104/ee43c9c9/attachment.html>

Seem to be getting a problem when running a feature with background. Running the whole file works fine however running an individual feature fails. The background steps are Background: Given an admin user Philip exists When I login as Philip Then I should be logged in as Philip running the following scenario on its own causes an error Scenario: Admin should be able to run a feed #

Have created sample sinatra cucumber app as suggested on wiki. Tried both env.rb configurations from there and aslaks git repo. With this combination of gems I get the following error doing basic cuc tests When I visit ''/foo'' # features/step_definitions/general.rb:1 PATH_INFO must start with / (Rack::Lint::LintError)

Hi, I''m pretty new to Rspec, so hope someone can help me out with this. I''m leveraging a couple pre-existing applications in my current project, both have fairly robust test suites in Rspec already. However, one is using Rspec''s builit in mocking, and the other is using mocha. If I set config.mock_with mocha in spec_helper.rb, then all of the rspec mocks fail. If I

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Scott Taylor <scott at railsnewbie.com> wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Joaquin Rivera Padron wrote: > > hello there, > how do you tipically spec private methods? The thing is ? have something > like this: > > def some_method > ?? complex_method + other_complex_methods > end > > private > def complex_method...

I''m working on writing features for a wizard. The wizard collects information from a number of different forms, and you can navigate through it in a number of ways. Anyhow one of these forms is a customer form collecting name, and email. In the context of the wizard I feel that the following scenarios Scenario: Given I step to customer And I fill in my customer details

As I work with Rails TestUnit tests I am reconsidering how to use cucumber features. It seems to me that it might be best to have a coherent view of how to arrange my test suites before I get much further into this. Now, so far I have considered three possibilities: 1. Use features exclusively. Create a feature file for each model, one for each controller and possibly an additional one for

Webrat 0.4.2 doesn''t seem to allow you to click links by title. Am I missing something stupid? With steps below running in sequence, first passes, second fails Then /^I should see a view (\w+) details link$/ do |object| response.should have_tag("a[title=#{object}_details]") end When /^I follow view (\w+) details link$/ do |object| click_link "#{object}_details}"

Hi all I''d like to keep the 10 slowest results shown when using --profile as an artifact of my ci builds. Is there some way to direct this particular output to a file/folder? Is there anything that produces an html version of this output e.g. a formatter? I''d be interested to know why --profile is not a formatter (its not a formatter in I''m using Jenkins for Ci and

Assuming you have a multi-step wizard like thing, with lots of different states and paths through it. What approach would your use to write a feature for it? What I want to do is do the separate states and then reuse these things in more complex scenarios that cover paths. For example Scenario: State A Given I''m ... And I''m ... When I ... Then I should see And I at