Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "apr26".
Did you mean:
apr22
2017 May 05
2
Memory leak in samba-ad-dc on 4.5.x not related to aio?
On somewhat long-running samba AD DC instances (4.5.8-Debian, Stretch),
we're seeming massive RAM utilization even with little/no clients connected:
> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
> root 9937 0.0 0.7 532004 7364 ? Ss Apr26 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba
> root 9980 0.0 0.4 532004 4304 ? S Apr26 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba
> root 9981 0.5 2.0 538720 20708 ? S Apr26 66:45 /usr/sbin/samba
> root 9983 0.0 0.8 536156 8444 ? S Apr26 0:02 /usr/sbin/samba
> root 998...
2023 Apr 24
1
nsd issue
Hi Jean Claude,
The message is printed when the bind operation failed. Why that happens
is hard to say, I'd need more information for that. As the message does
not say: address already in use (or similar), I'm guessing the address
is not configured?
Best regards,
Jeroen
On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 18:03 +0200, HAKIZIMANA Jean Claude via nsd-users
wrote:
> Dear nsd Users,
> kindly can
2017 May 05
2
Memory leak in samba-ad-dc on 4.5.x not related to aio?
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:21:05AM +0200, Sven Schwedas wrote:
> On 2017-05-05 10:09, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:42:47AM +0200, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote:
> >>> root 9988 0.8 59.4 1571936 606488 ? S Apr26 114:41 /usr/sbin/samba
> >
> > Can you post /proc/9988/smaps somewhere?
>
> Sure, http://up.tao.at/-0242609d03e69298bb27155078663d51/smaps.9988.txt
Ok, it's actually the heap. I was hoping that it's a mmap'ed ldb. So
we do have something fishy going on that. Sorry,...
2017 May 05
1
Memory leak in samba-ad-dc on 4.5.x not related to aio?
On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 09:42:47AM +0200, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote:
> > root 9988 0.8 59.4 1571936 606488 ? S Apr26 114:41 /usr/sbin/samba
Can you post /proc/9988/smaps somewhere?
Volker
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen
http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de
2004 Apr 27
1
multiple instances of asterisk spawning
...-c
root 782 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
root 783 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
root 784 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr23 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
root 6029 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S Apr26 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
root 6243 0.0 0.1 2920 912 pts/0 S 01:09 0:00 asterisk
-r
root 6244 0.0 1.5 116328 7656 ? S 01:09 0:00 asterisk
-vvvg -c
[root@phl-01 run]# cat /var/run/asterisk.pid
749
So asterisk does appear to be binding to the first instance (and...