search for: appy

I have never applied patches to wine, so i have a question: I downloaded wine git , then copied cursor-patches-1.1.8.patch to wine source dir, then When i entered $patch -p1 < cursor-patches-1.1.8.patch #receive $Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Does it miens that patch no needed? Already installed?

Hi, i have a small server with centos 7 samba 4.8.3 done domain provision, joined some windows 10 PCs and i'm happy i prefer manage it from RSAT and i created a lot of policy, and all seem fine! main problem is how to set ACL on User folders, i'm unable to set share permissions from Windows on samba users share, when appy changes i receive an error like permission denied. edited pam allowing domain us...

Has Bowman and Azzalini's sm library been ported to R yet (goes with Appied smoothing techniques for data analysis book)? I had a quick go but got tied up at a silly stage of ignorance caused I think (?hope) because I have never seriously used S+ at all. Rather than waste time, perhaps some kind soul has already done it. \John

Hi!! I look for wine execute without display but i don't make solution, for any appies wine need display, i have a ubuntu server, but this is not execute, server x, in this server i can't execute wine because this is no Display "Make sure that your X server is running and that $DISPLAY is set correctly." How to execute a application with wine without display bye

...ng <colin.king at canonical.com> Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at can...

...browse to \\server Right klik the profiles share, check security. If this is set correct, the user should not be able to see the rights. Repaet, now as Adminsitrator. You should see the needed rights. And in my thats on \\server\profiles Creator Owner ( 1700 ) Full with Special rights ( Appy to Only subfolders and files ) Administrator Full control ( Appy to This Folder, subfolders and files ) Domain Users Special with browse/exec, Read file/folder, create/add folder ( Only this folder ) And in my thats on \\server\profiles\user.v2 The resulting user folders should show ( in...

Hi, I have uploaded a new set of rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches and Gentoo ebuild for 2.6.31 to http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list, Jan Beulich recently identified the cause of the null pointer crash and other stability problems that affected previous versions and with the necessary fixes applied the kernel has run for 2+ days with no issues at all, I think you will find

Hello, After joining Windows 7 to a Samba 4 (AD), when logging on I experience 'Access denied' error accessing user profile. As a result, Windows creates temporary profile for the domain user (the profile is deleted upon logoff). The roaming profiles directory has been created according to instructions in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles Note: the home

Jamey, There is a previous posting in the speex archives with a link to the dsp c5x patch. Archive link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2004-October/002847.html Patch link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin But that patch is very different (much smaller) then the dsp c5x patch at

...RC 5 4 8 7 1 3 RC ----------------------------------------------------------- This is the requirement. i did it using for-loop,it will check each value and it taking time when bulk of data come. Any hope to do using lappy,appy kind of functions ? Because at a time complete coulmn should get update. Could you please help me urgently ? - Thanks Antony. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Column-create-and-Update-using-function-tp4636400.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Na...

Well I figured it out.. did not know that I could make a host file on the winblows client. I knew about the lmhosts file however.. this is a great list.. thanks to all.. *++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++* * Les Higger ITAF , * Local Area Network Coord. * lhigger@lausd.k12.ca.us * Francisco Bravo Medical Magnet High School * Los Angeles

...t correct, the user should not be able to >> see the rights. >>> >>> Repaet, now as Adminsitrator. >>> You should see the needed rights. >>> >>> And in my thats on \\server\profiles >>> Creator Owner ( 1700 ) Full with Special rights ( Appy to Only >>> subfolders and files ) >>> Administrator Full control ( Appy to This >> Folder, subfolders and >>> files ) >>> Domain Users Special with browse/exec, Read >> file/folder, create/add >>> folder ( Only this folder ) >>...

...> If this is set correct, the user should not be able to > see the rights. > > > > Repaet, now as Adminsitrator. > > You should see the needed rights. > > > > And in my thats on \\server\profiles > > Creator Owner ( 1700 ) Full with Special rights ( Appy to Only > > subfolders and files ) > > Administrator Full control ( Appy to This > Folder, subfolders and > > files ) > > Domain Users Special with browse/exec, Read > file/folder, create/add > > folder ( Only this folder ) > > > > And in my...

...9101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at can...

...9101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at can...

...9101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at can...

...9101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ] Detected by CoveritScan, CID#1324005 ("Operands don't affect result") Fixes: c25bf7b6155c ("drm/nouveau/bios/ramcfg: Separate out RON pull value") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at can...

From : Erwan Velu <erwan.velu at free.fr> This patch - remove the pci detection code from ethersel - add a find_pci_device() function in the PCI com32 module - make ethersel using the pci com32 module instead of builtin pci detection code Testing and feedback are welcome. Signed-off-by:Erwan Velu <erwan.velu at free.fr> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

I am implementing the latest version of Samba on HP-UX 11.0. The build and install went without obvious errors or problems. I have a Win95 (old version, no service packs loaded), 2 Win98, and 1 WinNT 4 SP4 machines which I am testing with. The 95 machine works fine. The 98 machine's can see the samba server but are denied access and the NT machine can't even see the server and reports

Almost forgot - diff need ot be appied only on FreeBSD 5 version of 550.ipfwlimit, but resulting file can be used on both 4 and 5 releases. On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Better version then previos, it will not break order of rules. awk version, it will work on all 4 and 5 releases, at least those, where IPFW enabled ;-) Also i removed check for