search for: appstreams

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches for "appstreams".

Did you mean: appstream
2020 Aug 17
2
C8 - Register with Red Hat
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:37:20 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > "This system is not registered to Red Hat Subscription Management. You can use > subscription-manager to register." It sounds like you have something installed that doesn't need to be or shouldn't be installed. Under what circumstances does that message appear? I haven't seen it on any of my C8 systems,
2024 Mar 14
0
CentOS Virt SIG and packages' priority problems?
Hello, some days ago I followed these instructions https://sigs.centos.org/virt/tdx/host/ and after enabling the repo I installed the tdx necessary bits as indicated, with the command dnf install kernel-tdx qemu-kvm-tdx libvirt-tdx This gave me: libvirt 9.5.0-1.el9s qemu-kvm 8.0.0-15.el9s kernel 5.14.0-395.el9s But now if I run a usual "dnf update" I'm proposed
2020 Aug 17
3
C8 - Register with Red Hat
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:03:24 -0500 Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I downloaded a Centos 8 image file : > > CentOS-8.1.1911-x86_64-dvd1.iso > > then I installed it as a kvm guest on a Centos 7 host machine. > > I installed a lot of the software; gui and server to give it a test drive. > > Nothing unusual about what I did that I can identify. And the message came up when
2020 Nov 08
0
dbus packages' versions not making sense
I have installed 1.12.8-10.el8_2, but when trying to install dbus-devel it is not available for that version, only 1.12.8-9.el8, which is also not available. Suggestions? # yum list | grep dbus dbus.x86_64 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2 @BaseOS dbus-common.noarch 1:1.12.8-10.el8_2
2020 Jun 07
2
EPEL repository: Failure to download metadata
Trying to install certbot, for Lets Encrypt certificate installation. How do I fix the below repo issue? I have not been successful tracking down this issue using google. [root at dream postfix]# yum install https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/epel-release-latest-8.noarch.rpm CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:10
2024 Mar 24
0
Problem 1: package resteasy-3.0.26-6.module_el8.4.0+595+e59c9af2.noarch from @System requires pki-servlet-4.0-api, but none of the providers can be installed
Dear CentOS members, Does someone know how to resolve this package conflict, it is creating security issues with freeipa dependencies. [root at freeipa01 ~]# yum update --refresh CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream 102 kB/s | 4.4 kB 00:00 CentOS Stream 8 - BaseOS 18
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
All, While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some package with unresolved dependencies. I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is trying to install the dependencies. . This happens for some critical package like boost-openmpi-devel (see below for
2020 Jan 16
0
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 23:29, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > All, > While updating my package using dnf update all I allow dnf to clean some > package with unresolved dependencies. > I would like to reinstall some of them but got an error message "but none > of the providers can be installed" during the install process as dnf is > trying
2020 Apr 21
2
CentOS repo question
Hi All, I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1. I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I just have the Appstream repos enabled. The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble updating the installation. The problem seems to be some installed rpms seem to depend on updates from
2020 Aug 05
3
CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??
On 05/08/2020 16:49, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: >> On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >>> >>>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>>> a resource? >>>> >>> CentOS
2020 Jan 16
2
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to are [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update CentOS-8 - AppStream 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 CentOS-8 - Base 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 CentOS-8 - Extras 2.9 kB/s | 2.1 kB 00:00 CentOS-8 - PowerTools 686 kB/s | 2.0 MB 00:02
2020 Aug 05
2
CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??
On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: > >> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >> a resource? >> > CentOS doesn't publish security errata. If you need it then you should > either buy RHEL, or deal with putting together your own set up with >
2020 Mar 11
1
[PATCH] builder: templates: add the AppStream repo
It is generally used together with BaseOS (which contains a restricted set of packages), so add it to the preconfigured repositories by default. --- builder/templates/make-template.ml | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/templates/make-template.ml b/builder/templates/make-template.ml index 8d26177bf..a4e2f37fb 100755 ---
2020 Apr 22
2
CentOS repo question
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, johnny at centos.org wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University > of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. > On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I've just
2020 Mar 24
1
Issue with AppStream
is there an issue happening ? yum provides "*/firewall-config" CentOS-8 - AppStream 0.0 B/s | 0 B 00:05 Failed to download metadata for repo 'AppStream' Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'AppStream' jerry
2020 Aug 05
0
CentOS Security Advisories OVAL feed??
On 8/5/20 1:05 AM, centos at niob.at wrote: > On 04/08/2020 23:50, Jon Pruente wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:34 AM <centos at niob.at> wrote: >> >>> Q5) If the answer to the last question is "no": shouldn't there be such >>> a resource? >>> >> CentOS doesn't publish security errata. If you need it then you should
2019 Nov 25
1
yum4 and dnf on CentOS 8
...ise Linux users > and scripts are used to the yum commands. You can use either dnf or > yum4 on the command line and get the same results. You mentioned you're familiar with Fedora, so you're probably aware of Application Streams -- but for those reading this thread unfamiliar with AppStreams, I'll add the caveat that dnf behaves differently than yum in this regard. Here's some background: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/8/html/installing_managing_and_removing_user_space_components/using-appstream_using-appstream Right now, the only EL8...
2020 May 06
2
Ailing MATE desktop
On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Robert G (Doc) Savage via CentOS wrote: > > I'm about ready to run "dnf erase *mate*" and try re-installing MATE > from scratch from the GNOME3 desktop. Is that possible without > ripping > the heart out of C8 by deleting other critical packages? I've attached a capture of "dnf erase *mate*" that shows the 104 packages
2020 May 05
2
Ailing MATE desktop
On Tue, 5 May 2020 05:30:26 -0400 Eddie O'Connor wrote: > Are there .conf files for the desktop?....what about logs?....something's > got to be amiss somewhere....and Linux always complains when it is.....in > logs. Just wondering out loud... What happens if he sets up a new user? Does the desktop work then? -- Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one has a virus.
2019 Sep 25
5
CentOS 8.0 1905 is now available for download
...er PHP 7.2 with fpm and > Python 3.6, which is exactly what I installed from 3rd party > repositories in Centos 7 on my vps. I will test upgrade from C7 to > disable epel and webtatic. Did you try SCL instead of directly installing packages from another repo? It is similar to how the new Appstreams allow multiple concurrent versions. > I'm waiting for blogs and "youtubs" to report > on appstream and what I could install from Fedora maybe. I have more > confidence in Fedora repos than epel, since the latter is usually > rebuild Fedora packages anyway. > EPEL is...