search for: approval

On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:02:57PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 4 May 2015 at 21:55, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. > > There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from > > code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before > > the start of 'official' testing. > > Hi Tom, > > Where's the list? Is there any ARM left? > > LLVM: #r232449 Need approval #r232794 Need approval #r233312 Need appro...

Hello, I am working on some examples of GLMM for my students but I am afraid that my way of preparing a dataframe to pass to lmer will make them think that R is a very difficult and un-natural language. Here is for example a simple data set about approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals. > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1, p.494) > rating <- matrix(c(794, 86, 150, 570), 2, 2) > dimnames(rating) <- list(First = c("approve", "disapprove"), +...

Hi everyone, I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the process. The developer policy states: "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get approval, submit a patch <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you may commit it yourself." Do I have to send the patch to llvm-commits via email and wa...

I have time-series data on approval ratings of British Prime Ministers. The prime ministers dating from MacMillan onward till today are coded as dummy variables and the approval ratings are entered for each month. I want to know the mean value of the approval rating of each Prime Minister in the dataset and the approval rating duri...

> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com>wrote: > >> On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am >> not sure if it serves Chris's

I just got back from Boston where we completed testing of the TE410P for FCC, Euro, and Australian approvals, and I'm happy to say we passed all our approvals (including Q.921 and Q.931 layers, i.e. libpri as well as surges) for both telco and leased line applications. Hopefully we'll have the official documents soon, but I know there are a lot of you out there that are happy to hear that. Mark...

nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on the APL, only RedHat and SuSE

Hi, I am considering installing several `servers' in a facility that needs to conform with the products listed at: DSD Approved Products http://www.dsd.gov.au/infosec/evaluation_services/epl/dap.html As far as i can see freebsd performs above and beyond, for all the required criteria in the act. Can we see freebsd listed as an approved product in the near future? Best Regards, Jason - RF

...t of libraries and drivers for fast packet processing. Packets being network packets. That posting is not spam, but it should not go to this mailinglist. Thing I'm telling is that there is at least one person ( me :-) who does act upon 'Syslinux post from localpart at domain.tld requires approval' messages. Sometimes I think I should handover that/this job. Mostly I think "it is not much effort, just continue". Now I found a good opportunity to tell about it, hence this message. Regards Geert Stappers -- Live and let live ----- Forwarded message from syslinux-owner at zyt...

Hi Pawel, >> Can you provide some examples of the problems you are seeing? > > Here is what happens. > > I get a message "could you please include/add/merge this r16xxxx into > 3.2?". And my immediate reaction is sure, no problem this fixes > PR/issue/crash so it is important. But are you the code owner > and do you approve? So I have to go and start checking

...gt; > > On 1 Mar 2020, at 14:44, Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > I recently was granted commit access, but I'm not really sure what is the > process. > The developer policy states: > "You are granted *commit-after-approval* to all parts of LLVM. To get > approval, submit a patch > <https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#patch> to llvm-commits > <http://lists.llvm.org/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits>. When approved, you > may commit it yourself." > > Do I have to send the patch to...

I have started to read r-help on Gmane using Thunderbird as a reader. Before that I had messages sent to gmail account. The first post through Gmane needed moderator approval, but then I got a message from Your friendly autoauthorizer at Gmane.org saying You are now authorized to post to the gmane.comp.lang.r.general newsgroup. But my messages are still needing moderator approval, which I assumed would no longer be needed given the message from my friendly autoaut...

Hi, I am no longer accepting new patch nominations for the 3.6.1 branches. There are a handful of outstanding patches waiting for approval from code owners, I may still merge these if I get code owner approval before the start of 'official' testing. We had originally planed to start 'official' testing today, however a regression was found in the 3.6 branch, so I would like to delay testing until this is fixed. Here i...

I would just like to get a refresh of the situation for Australian users. It would seem that the TE400P is currently available and is likely to acheive approval for use in Australia within the next 2 months ? (when is the end of summer?). Once this is done, it will certainly suit larger installations, but it still leaves a number of 'gaps'. Anyone with analog phone lines will need either X101P or similar, or else an Australian approved channel ba...

...i Tom, > > I would like to propose the following additional patches for 3.5.1. These will already be part of the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base system. Apologies in advance for the long list. :) > Hi Dimitry, Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval. It might help to send a separate email per code owner. Thanks, Tom > > Enabling TLS support for PowerPC32: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=213960&view=rev > > [PowerPC] Support TLS on PPC32/ELF > > Patch by Justin Hibbits! > > > T...

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 18:45, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sure where the idea that a patch series is anything other than that ^ came from. When I was talking about a patch series, it was/is with that definition in mind - ordered/dependent commits. I said "dependent series" to reinforce this idea that the kind of situation I was describing was one

On 4/28/2015 9:49 AM, bobby Orellano wrote: > nowhere does it say that centos is approved for use in DoD. it is not on > the APL, only RedHat and SuSE DoD approval requires spending lots of money jumping through arbitrary hoops. Do you wish to pay for this? skimming the requirements, it also requires extensive documentation of said 'Product'. Do you wish to write this? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, syslinux-bounces at zytor.com wrote: > Your mail to 'SYSLINUX' with the subject > > Re: [syslinux] Syslinux keyboard mappings > > Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. > > The reason it is being held: > > Message has a suspicious header > > Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive > notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel > this posting, please visit the following URL: &...

Hello, I posted a question yesterday but I got no replies, so I'll try to reformulate it in a more concise way. I have the following data, summarizing approval ratings on two different surveys for a random sample of 1600 individuals: > ## Example: Ratings of prime minister (Agresti, Table 12.1, p.494) > rating <- matrix(c(794, 86, 150, 570), 2, 2) > dimnames(rating) <- list(First = c("approve", "disapprove"), +...

On 11/17/2012 6:35 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > >> I think that the code owner process is becoming complicated and I am not sure if it serves Chris's original intent. I don't think that we need to change every file nor do we need an automatic tool to find the owner. I think that a simple text