search for: appoach

I have a variable that can have either numeric or character values. When numeric, I take one action; when not-numeric, I take another action. Unfortunately, my approaches are awkward, so I look for others' approaches. To detect a numeric value, I have semi-successfully used two appoaches. I somewhat simplify here using direct character values like "123" rather than a variable. 1. !is.na(as.numeric("123")) which responds "TRUE", but !is.na(as.numeric("abc")) responds FALSE #so I know it is not numeric Warning messa...

..._view/helpers/url_helper.rb:11:in `send'' /gems/actionpack-1.3.1/lib/action_view/helpers/url_helper.rb:11:in `url_for'' /gems/actionpack-1.3.1/lib/action_view/helpers/tag_helper.rb:35:in `start_form_tag'' (erb):5:in `render_template'' 2. so I changed my appoach to plain html likes <form action="http://myhostname/mycontroller/myaction" method="post"> blah blah, most hidden type <input type="submit"> </form> then, when I click submit from mail client, Rails identify it as "get request" not "...

I'm setting up a new domain with Samba 3.0.30 as the PDC using the tdbsam backend. 'net group' yields an empty list, which is consistent with the cautious appoach that Samba takes: don't do anything automagically. But, a new Windows PDC will come online with several well-known domain users and groups. Did I miss the step where I run some stock script that creates these expected objects? -- Mark H. Wood, radical centrist OpenPGP ID 876A8B75 m...

...ion(...) doesn't make any sense. > > Probably the right thing to do would be to make the inst_iterator return a > reference to the *instruction* itself, rather than a reference to the > pointer. This would make it work the same as standard ilist iterators. Yes, I though about this appoach as well but decided it can be too disturbing for other code. > The reason why we have it return pointers right now is to populate > worklists, which allows us to do: > > std::set<Instruction*> WorkList(inst_begin(F), inst_end(F)); Maybe this can be rewritten like; std::set...

..., fishy huh? :) > > Probably the right thing to do would be to make the inst_iterator return a > > reference to the *instruction* itself, rather than a reference to the > > pointer. This would make it work the same as standard ilist iterators. > > Yes, I though about this appoach as well but decided it can be too disturbing > for other code. I think it's the most correct and consistent want to do it. > > The reason why we have it return pointers right now is to populate > > worklists, which allows us to do: > > > > std::set<Instruction*&g...

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > and since result of *it is considered to be rvalue it can't be accepted by > this operator. The complete discussion is in > > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1385.htm > > I'd suggest to apply the following patch which makes operator* return > reference to pointer. It makes my code compile and the rest

...y the right thing to do would be to make the inst_iterator > > > return a reference to the *instruction* itself, rather than a reference > > > to the pointer. This would make it work the same as standard ilist > > > iterators. > > > > Yes, I though about this appoach as well but decided it can be too > > disturbing for other code. > > I think it's the most correct and consistent want to do it. Great. > > > The reason why we have it return pointers right now is to populate > > > worklists, which allows us to do: > > >...

Hello, I think there's a rather subtle problem with the inst_iterator. It declares its iterator category as std::bidirectional_iterator_tag but C++ standard requirements for forward iterator (which are included in requirements for bidirection iterator), say that the type of expression *r; should be T&, where 'r' is the iterator and T is its value type. The inst_iterator,

...an split HTML content. More over, it can ‘resize’ HTML tags having width= attribute*. * Imagine you want to resize <iframe> embeddings from YouTube saved in static content. Install Put this line in your Gemfile: gem ''html_slicer'' Then bundle: % bundle Implementation Basic appoach slice <method_name>, <configuration>, [:config => <:style>]* where: <method_name> - any method or local variable which returns source String (can be called with .send()). <configuration> - Hash of configuration options and/or :config parameter. Basic example clas...

...rob=abs(1-Bin_cumper) #Combines parcel acreage data and cumlative percentage data BinMain.data = cbind(Bin_Acres,Bin_parprob,Bin_TAZ,Bin_TAZvacant) }) #----------------------------------------------------------------- I am thinking that a simple for loop would work with a paste command but that appoach has yet to work either. Thanks Cheers, JR -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/loading-and-manipulating-10-data-frames-simplified-tp22731441p22731441.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.