Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "applyspeclib".
2020 May 22
3
Compatibility issues caused by new simplify argument in apply function
...ot
pass the
checks in R-devel.
The workaround, Kurt Hornik send me, is working for the R-code:
if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply)))
do something
else
do something else
Unfortunately, I cannot conditionalize the man pages of the functions. I get
the message
that "applySpeclib.Rd:12-14: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be
dropped" if I try to
dynamically define the entire usage section. If I try to use \Sexpr inside the
\usage section,
I get the following warning: "applySpeclib.Rd:13-15: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in
a \usage block"
Does anybody ha...
2020 May 22
2
Compatibility issues caused by new simplify argument in apply function
...rking for the R-code:
> > if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply)))
> > do something
> > else
> > do something else
> >
> > Unfortunately, I cannot conditionalize the man pages of the functions. I get
> > the message
> > that "applySpeclib.Rd:12-14: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be
> > dropped" if I try to
> > dynamically define the entire usage section. If I try to use \Sexpr inside the
> > \usage section,
> > I get the following warning: "applySpeclib.Rd:13-15: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in
&g...
2020 May 22
0
Compatibility issues caused by new simplify argument in apply function
...workaround, Kurt Hornik send me, is working for the R-code:
> if("simplify" %in% names(formals(base::apply)))
> do something
> else
> do something else
>
> Unfortunately, I cannot conditionalize the man pages of the functions. I get
> the message
> that "applySpeclib.Rd:12-14: Section \Sexpr is unrecognized and will be
> dropped" if I try to
> dynamically define the entire usage section. If I try to use \Sexpr inside the
> \usage section,
> I get the following warning: "applySpeclib.Rd:13-15: Tag \Sexpr is invalid in
> a \usage block&qu...