search for: applu

...binary code of an executing program. Specifically, I want to be able to insert NOPs (into functions and loops) at compile time that I patch into calls to subroutines at runtime. My questions are: A. The testresults at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ show that several benchmarks (swim, applu, tomcatv, su2cor...) in the Spec CFP 2000 and 95 suites failed when run under the JIT. Why did they fail and what are the limitations in running Spec benchmarks? B. Is what I am suggesting in 3 possible in LLVM? C. Has anyone here used both LLVM and Intel's PIN? If so, can you comment on t...

Anyone know what to do about this: make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/173.applu' make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/178.galgel' /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte -dcfuns -dusty f95: unrecognized option '-kind=byte' f951: warning: unre...

...insert NOPs and then write over them? Can't you just replace calls to functions with calls to new functions that in turn call whatever subroutines you like? > My questions are: > > A. The testresults at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ show that > several benchmarks (swim, applu, tomcatv, su2cor...) in the Spec CFP 2000 > and 95 suites failed when run under the JIT. Why did they fail and what > are the limitations in running Spec benchmarks? I'm not sure why these don't run in the JIT, actually. They should. (Anyone?) > B. Is what I am suggesting in 3 p...

...rc/dcabs1.f:1: <path>/lib/f95.h:109: error: syntax error before ‘Logical4’ <path>/lib/f95.h:109: warning: data definition has no type or sto rage class <path>/lib/f95.h:118: error: syntax error before ‘Integer4’ ... Affected SPEC CPU2000 benchmarks: wupwise, swim, mgrid, applu *** f95 PANIC Another f95 specific issue is a PANIC when compiling the code of apsi to C code. More specific: Panic: apsi.f: Unexpected expr node 47050 type 414 in tree flattener Internal Error -- please report this bug Again, this is no job for the LLVM people. Affected benchmarks...

Using OpenSSH_2.9p2 on Linux and Sparc Solaris. Trying to connect from Linux to Solaris, with remote port-forwarding i.e. On Linux, ssh -R 3000:Linux:23 Solaris The connection is established okay, but the port-forwarding does not work; on Solaris, the connection to localhost port 3000 is accepted, but it appears as if no data makes it back to port 23 on Linux. If an older 1.2.30 sshd is used

On 25 Nov 2006, at 09:02, Reid Spencer wrote: > Anyone know what to do about this: > > make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/173.applu' > make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/ > CFP2000/178.galgel' > /usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec// > CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte - > dcfuns -dusty > f95: unrecognized option '...

On 31 Aug 2006, at 23:46, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Kenneth Hoste wrote: >> Bummer. I think I'll contact the NAG support for more info on >> this. Can you >> show me the content of your Makefile.nagfortran? > > It is identical to yours. > >> Also, it is possible to tell make only to compile benchmark X? How >> can I >>

...========= 168.wupwise 3417 2873 3428 18.93% -0.32% 41970 43851 49154 -4.29% -14.62% 171.swim 7086 7126 7105 -0.56% -0.27% 16906 16857 18641 0.29% -9.31% 172.mgrid 2007 1917 1982 4.69% 1.26% 21272 21224 23086 0.23% -7.86% 173.applu 3445 3285 3241 4.87% 6.29% 67164 67124 63130 0.06% 6.39% 177.mesa 3612 2752 3597 31.25% 0.42% 570567 590889 561250 -3.44% 1.66% 178.galgel 6637 6809 6617 -2.53% 0.30% 225564 225583 233742 -0.01% -3.50% 179.art 6710 52...

...the execution diff seems to be empty. Additionally, I don't think the programs get executed at all, because make runs too fast. For gap/gcc, only the cbe test fails, the other (including JIT) are ok. Affected benchmarks: galgel, equake, lucas, gcc, gap, facerec, sixtrack, wupwise, mgrid, applu, apsi Since these include both SPECfp and SPECint benchmarks, this has nothing todo with f95. *** 2) *** Undefined references With 3 benchmarks (vpr, crafty and eon), I'm getting similar undefined references: /tmp/ccGCQxYs.o(.text+0x76b2): In function `init_chan': 175.vpr.cbe.c: u...

...========= 168.wupwise 3417 2873 3428 18.93% -0.32% 41970 43851 49154 -4.29% -14.62% 171.swim 7086 7126 7105 -0.56% -0.27% 16906 16857 18641 0.29% -9.31% 172.mgrid 2007 1917 1982 4.69% 1.26% 21272 21224 23086 0.23% -7.86% 173.applu 3445 3285 3241 4.87% 6.29% 67164 67124 63130 0.06% 6.39% 177.mesa 3612 2752 3597 31.25% 0.42% 570567 590889 561250 -3.44% 1.66% 178.galgel 6637 6809 6617 -2.53% 0.30% 225564 225583 233742 -0.01% -3.50% 179.art 6710 52...

...be empty. > Additionally, I don't think the programs get executed at all, because > make runs too fast. > > For gap/gcc, only the cbe test fails, the other (including JIT) are ok. > > Affected benchmarks: galgel, equake, lucas, gcc, gap, facerec, > sixtrack, wupwise, mgrid, applu, apsi > > Since these include both SPECfp and SPECint benchmarks, this has > nothing todo with f95. > > *** 2) *** Undefined references > > With 3 benchmarks (vpr, crafty and eon), I'm getting similar > undefined references: > > /tmp/ccGCQxYs.o(.text+0x76b2): In fu...