Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "applicationx".
Did you mean:
application
2008 Oct 24
2
force user and read only
Hi
I need a share with read-only access for some developers (to read
logfiles). the logfiles are owned by the application user and group
and have 700 permissions. I have set up the share like this:
path = /applicationx/logs
read only = Yes
valid users = "MYDOMAIN+DEVELOPER1"
force user = applicationx
It does work very well, but somehow it does not look nice to me... Is
there a way to do it without the force user option and keeping the 700
permissions?
regards
urs
2006 Mar 31
2
Capistrano, multiple instances of an application
...#39;'m wondering if/how others in similar situations may be
using Capistrano to help manage such scenerios?
Just to make sure I''m not being too vague, I have several applications
and they were each designed such that they each serve one customer and
I have many customers. So, I deploy ApplicationX out once for every
customer, potentially on multiple machines. As I make changes to
ApplicationX I push the changes out to each of the deployed instances.
When''s the book expected to be out, btw? :)
-Mike
2006 May 04
7
windows / migration issues
Running latest rails, etc on windows xp.
I can''t use "rake migrate" to migrate to latest version. I NEED to
specify, i.e. "rake migrate VERSION=11" for things to work
consistently.
plain ''ol "rake migrate" never makes it to the latest version. no
errors, she just stops short of the latest version.
hasn''t been a problem until now --