Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "apple_".
Did you mean:
apple
2018 Jun 13
4
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
...good time
to recap what has been done here so far. I am happy to report that
stages 1-3 (i.e. producer/consumer in llvm and integration with lldb)
of my original plan are now complete with one caveat.
The caveat is that the .debug_names section is presently not a full
drop-in replacement for the .apple_*** sections. The reason for that
is that there is no equivalent to the .apple_objc section (which links
an objc class/category name to all of its methods). I did not
implement that, because I do not see a way to embed that kind of
information to this section without some sort of an extension. Give...
2018 Jun 13
2
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
...y to report that
>> stages 1-3 (i.e. producer/consumer in llvm and integration with lldb)
>> of my original plan are now complete with one caveat.
>
> Awesome!
>
>> The caveat is that the .debug_names section is presently not a full
>> drop-in replacement for the .apple_*** sections. The reason for that
>> is that there is no equivalent to the .apple_objc section (which links
>> an objc class/category name to all of its methods). I did not
>> implement that, because I do not see a way to embed that kind of
>> information to this section wit...
2018 Jun 14
3
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
> On Jun 14, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Pavel Labath via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Thank you all. I am going to try to reply to all comments in a single email.
>
> Regarding the .apple_objc idea, I am afraid the situation is not as
> simple as just flipping a switch.
Jonas is currently working on adding the support for DWARF5-style Objective-C accelerator tables to LLVM/LLDB/dsymutil. Based on the assumption that DWARF 4 and earlier are unaffected by any of this, I don't t...
2018 Jan 30
1
[lldb-dev] Adding DWARF5 accelerator table support to llvm
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 17:13:36 +0100, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev wrote:
> so I'm writing this email to see if there's anyone
> else interested in this topic, and to try to synchronize our efforts.
I am sure interested in DWARF-5 .debug_names. I wrote its producer+consumer
for GDB (but not producing/using DW_IDX_DIE_offset as GDB cannot use it).
> 1. add .debug_names support to