search for: applaying

Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "applaying".

2018 Jun 20
2
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
Hello. I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...). I have found that changes hosts allow option are not applaying without restart smbd. I have tried: systemctl reload smbd.service killall -1 smbd pkill -HUP smbd smbcontrol smbd reload-config but client I have added does not have access. I see strange messages in system log: Jun 20 15:50:20 nvkzsrv smbd[29943]: [2018/06/20 15:50:20.705223,  0] ../source3/li...
2018 Jun 21
2
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
Hi, Rowland, I have the same issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. Yours Adam From: Rowland Penny via samba Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 To: samba Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0700 Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain > controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...). > > I have found that c...
2018 Jun 21
0
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
...issue too. I can't find any useful info after I ran 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer answer. Thanks. > > > > Yours Adam > > From: Rowland Penny via samba > Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 > To: samba > Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd > On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0700 > Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain >> controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...)....
2018 Jun 21
2
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
...n 'man smbcontrol', could you give us a clearer > > answer. Thanks. > > > > > > > > Yours Adam > > > > From: Rowland Penny via samba > > Date: 2018-06-20 17:40 > > To: samba > > Subject: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying without > > restart smbd On Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:22:36 +0700 > > Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain > >> controllers), d...
2018 Jun 20
0
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
Hello. I have a lot of servers with CentOS 7 and samba 4 (classic domain controllers), differnt versions (4.4.4, 4.6.2...). I have found that changes hosts allow option are not applaying without restart smbd. I have tried: systemctl reload smbd.service killall -1 smbd pkill -HUP smbd smbcontrol smbd reload-config but client I have added does not have access. I see strange messages in system log: Jun 20 15:50:20 nvkzsrv smbd[29943]: [2018/06/20 15:50:20.705223,  0] ../source3/li...
2018 Jun 21
1
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
...t tried it. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 21 juni 2018 15:39 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] hosts allow option is not applaying > without restart smbd > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:31:17 +0200 > Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Am 21.06.2018 um 15:23 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:17:14 +0700 > > &gt...
2018 Jun 21
3
hosts allow option is not applaying without restart smbd
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 19:17:14 +0700 Vladimir Eltsov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello. > > I have read man smbcontrol. > > I wrote in start message: > > > I have tried: > > systemctl reload smbd.service > > killall -1 smbd > > pkill -HUP smbd Forget 'systemctl reload' Forget 'killall' Forget 'pkill' >
2002 Mar 16
3
hi
Where can I find a patch for ext3 fs for kernel-2.4.2. Currently I'm using RH7.1 I dont want to upgrade to RH7.2!!! I just want to applay the ext3 patch for kernel-2.4.2 compile and use it. Thanks in advance! Sanat
2002 Mar 16
0
ext3-help
Where can I find a patch for ext3 fs for kernel-2.4.2. Currently I'm using RH7.1 I dont want to upgrade to RH7.2!!! I just want to applay the ext3 patch for kernel-2.4.2 compile and use it. Thanks in advance! Sanat
2008 Sep 16
0
AutoCAD 2005 and Wine 1.1.4
Hello... What is the status of AutoCAD 2005 under Wine 1.1.4... Is it still need applay any patches and recompile Wine, or nothing is need for install, only winetricks??
2004 Mar 04
0
Réf. : printers unreachable in samba 3.0.2?
Already fixed in CVS. See this report for the patch and applay it. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147 ----------------------------------- St?phane PURNELLE stephane.purnelle@corman.be Service Informatique Corman S.A. Tel : 00 32 087/342467 |---------+---------------------------------------------------------> | |
2005 Feb 15
0
Identd in jail.
Hi Few days ago I've problem with running identd in jail on 4.10-stable I've found that getcred() sysctl isn't permitted from within jail on 4.x. R.Watson suggest some "cheap hack" for this but I've solved this without patching the kernel. My patched ident gets result of getcred() sysctl from jauthd daemon via unix socket. Jauthd is simply getcred proxy, it gets two
2005 Aug 20
0
[PATCH] remove some FZIGZAG
...19 ./dump /mnt/disc4/theora/unix/gripen.ogg > /dev/null Ogg logical stream 310b2968 is Theora 720x480 29.97 fps video Encoded frame content is 720x480 with 0x0 offset 12460 frames This patch is as I had it working. I just want to submit it before I will forgot about it :) Derf please consider applaying this into SVN in some form. Thanks, Regards Rudolf -------------- next part -------------- diff -Naur ../mergeSTATE/test/lib/decode.c test/lib/decode.c --- ../mergeSTATE/test/lib/decode.c 2005-08-17 09:58:23.000000000 +0200 +++ test/lib/decode.c 2005-08-20 11:19:04.052143250 +0200 @@ -1083,53 +108...
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
Please note that Windows 9x clients are not true members of a domain for reasons outlined in this article. Therefore the protocol for support Windows 9x style domain logons is completely different from NT4 domain logons and has been officially supported for some time. Did you read this document? Let me know what needs to be updated and i will take care of it. Cheers, jerry