search for: appi

I have never applied patches to wine, so i have a question: I downloaded wine git , then copied cursor-patches-1.1.8.patch to wine source dir, then When i entered $patch -p1 < cursor-patches-1.1.8.patch #receive $Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Does it miens that patch no needed? Already installed?

Hi, i have a small server with centos 7 samba 4.8.3 done domain provision, joined some windows 10 PCs and i'm happy i prefer manage it from RSAT and i created a lot of policy, and all seem fine! main problem is how to set ACL on User folders, i'm unable to set share permissions from Windows on samba users share, when appy changes i receive an error like permission denied. edited

Has Bowman and Azzalini's sm library been ported to R yet (goes with Appied smoothing techniques for data analysis book)? I had a quick go but got tied up at a silly stage of ignorance caused I think (?hope) because I have never seriously used S+ at all. Rather than waste time, perhaps some kind soul has already done it. \John -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-...

Hi!! I look for wine execute without display but i don't make solution, for any appies wine need display, i have a ubuntu server, but this is not execute, server x, in this server i can't execute wine because this is no Display "Make sure that your X server is running and that $DISPLAY is set correctly." How to execute a application with wine without display bye

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the ! operator will result in the desired result. [ Note, not tested ]

Hai, Sorry to say but.. > The solution (following the default how-to directories structure): No, the solution is to setup correctly. Just do a a small test here to see if its all correct. With a windows computer, browse to \\server Right klik the profiles share, check security. If this is set correct, the user should not be able to see the rights. Repaet, now as Adminsitrator.

Hi, I have uploaded a new set of rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches and Gentoo ebuild for 2.6.31 to http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list, Jan Beulich recently identified the cause of the null pointer crash and other stability problems that affected previous versions and with the necessary fixes applied the kernel has run for 2+ days with no issues at all, I think you will find

Hello, After joining Windows 7 to a Samba 4 (AD), when logging on I experience 'Access denied' error accessing user profile. As a result, Windows creates temporary profile for the domain user (the profile is deleted upon logoff). The roaming profiles directory has been created according to instructions in https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles Note: the home

...permail/speex-dev/2004-October/002847.html Patch link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin But that patch is very different (much smaller) then the dsp c5x patch at http://handhelds.org/~jamey/speex/speex-1.1.6-jeh2.patch. I had appied the patch at this link: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20041029/facb8c73/spee x-1.1.6-jeh1-0001.bin and enabled FIXED_POINT and speex is running on dsp c5x So now I'm wondering, did I get the whole patch? Which patch is the one I should be using? Regards, Paul --...

Hi, here i have a Max and Min values Min <-3 Max <-6 and also a matrix like this, ABC XYZ PQR ------ ------- ------- 2 4 3 5 4 8 7 1 3 In this i need to check each particular column values are between Max and Min value. If the coulmn value not coming between Max and

...Gerald Carter <cartegw@Eng.Auburn.EDU> > 7) \\host\root > by "Kalt, Christophe" <Christophe.Kalt@kbcfp.com> > 8) Problem with browsing > by Todd Bedell <bedellt@tycoelectronics.com> > 9) VMware > by Juan Carlos Castro y Castro <jcastro@appi.com.br> > 10) Re: VMware > by Brian Servis <servis@purdue.edu> > 11) problem with shares > by Les Higger <lhigger@lausd.k12.ca.us> > 12) Re: browse lists > by Giulio Orsero <giulioo@tiscalinet.it> > 13) Re: Samba Server cannot find shares on NT...

Hello Louis, In fact, the shares mentioned in my original messages are used in Windows-only. The accounts, however, are used in both Windows and Unix-type environments (we have quite a zoo of OSes in active use); so we actually use the Posix part of accounts for attributes and Kerberos component to authenticate in all non-Windows use. So my primary intent is to make the homes/profiles shares

Hai, Now, i did not know you used the DC for the profiles here but yes it looks good. Small comment on point 3 and 4. 3) Its good, you might notice a few more rights there compaired to what i posted, thats because you have your profiles on the DC but the settings are good. 4) yes, the security is ok, i like the higher security setting and try to mimic the windows settings as much as

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> [ Upstream commit 13649101a25c53c87f4ab98a076dfe61f3636ab1 ] Currently, the expression for calculating RON is always going to result in zero no matter the value of ram->mr[1] because the ! operator has higher precedence than the shift >> operator. I believe the missing parentheses around the expression before appying the !

From : Erwan Velu <erwan.velu at free.fr> This patch - remove the pci detection code from ethersel - add a find_pci_device() function in the PCI com32 module - make ethersel using the pci com32 module instead of builtin pci detection code Testing and feedback are welcome. Signed-off-by:Erwan Velu <erwan.velu at free.fr> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment

I am implementing the latest version of Samba on HP-UX 11.0. The build and install went without obvious errors or problems. I have a Win95 (old version, no service packs loaded), 2 Win98, and 1 WinNT 4 SP4 machines which I am testing with. The 95 machine works fine. The 98 machine's can see the samba server but are denied access and the NT machine can't even see the server and reports

Almost forgot - diff need ot be appied only on FreeBSD 5 version of 550.ipfwlimit, but resulting file can be used on both 4 and 5 releases. On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:59:51PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Better version then previos, it will not break order of rules. awk version, it will work on all 4 and 5 releases, at least...