search for: apparmor_status

...only using the Administrator so far. Does Domain Users have a gidNumber attribute containing a number inside > 10000-999999 ? > > Yes, 10000. Is Apparmor (or Selinux) running and denying access ? No Selinux present. As for Apparmor, it doesn't look like it. ubuntu at fs1:/$ sudo apparmor_status apparmor module is loaded. 9 profiles are loaded. 9 profiles are in enforce mode. /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client.action /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-helper /usr/lib/connman/scripts/dhclient-script /usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine /usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine//mount-namespace-cap...

...r. The non-updated-IDMAP configuration I started the thread with did not have a duplicate user ACL for the groups and therefore I suspect it isn?t contributing to this issue. apparmor: I tried the following commands to see if apparmor was enabled: cat /sys/module/apparmor/parameters/enabled sudo apparmor_status Neither returned a result. Selinux: I tried the following commands to see if selinux was enabled: sudo getenforce sudo sestatus Neither returned a result. Therefore, I suspect that apparmor and selinux are not installed/enabled. Best Regards, Unraidster

...iguration I > started the thread with did not have a duplicate user ACL for the > groups and therefore I suspect it isn?t contributing to this issue. > > apparmor: I tried the following commands to see if apparmor was > enabled: cat /sys/module/apparmor/parameters/enabled > sudo apparmor_status > > Neither returned a result. > > Selinux: I tried the following commands to see if selinux was enabled: > sudo getenforce > sudo sestatus > > Neither returned a result. > > Therefore, I suspect that apparmor and selinux are not > installed/enabled. > &...

...reate "user directory" using %LogonUser% via a group profile. That deosn't seem to be working, but I don't know if it's related. > > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or Selinux is > installed and enabled. > > Rowland I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not found' so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 from the LiveCD with the cinnamon desktop.

...don't > >> know if it's related. > >> > > >> > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or > Selinux is > >> > installed and enabled. > >> > > >> > Rowland > >> > >> I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not > >> found' > >> so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 > from the LiveCD > >> with the cinnamon desktop. > > > > OK, it is late here, but just in case something has > changed, I will set >...

Yeah, AppArmor is enabled, but I put everything (that I could find) into complain mode: $ sudo apparmor_status apparmor module is loaded. 12 profiles are loaded. 3 profiles are in enforce mode. lxc-container-default lxc-container-default-with-mounting lxc-container-default-with-nesting 9 profiles are in complain mode. /sbin/dhclient /usr/bin/lxc-start /usr/lib/NetworkManager/nm-dhcp-client...

...User% > via a group profile. That deosn't seem to be working, but I don't > know if it's related. > > > > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or Selinux is > > installed and enabled. > > > > Rowland > > I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not > found' > so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 from the LiveCD > with the cinnamon desktop. OK, it is late here, but just in case something has changed, I will set up a new Debian 9 VM tommorrow, install the distro Samba Packa...

...s > I thought it was, if you are going to sanitise things, do it everywhere ;-) > > > > Is Apparmor (or Selinux) running and denying access ? > > > > > > No Selinux present. As for Apparmor, it doesn't look like it. > > > > ubuntu at fs1:/$ sudo apparmor_status > > apparmor module is loaded. > > Yes it is, you need to find out if Apparmor is your problem (I think it > is) and how to fix it, if it is. I cannot help you, I always 'apt-get > purge apparmor'. The problem with Apparmor (and Selinux) is that you get > strange 'p...

On 2016-08-19 12:17, ben at indietorrent.org wrote: > Aha! Clearly, the vmail user cannot read from nor write to /tmp. (Why > that is, I have no idea, as the /tmp directory's permissions certainly > allow for both; maybe Dovecot implements this as a security measure.) > > This prompted me to change all references to /tmp in the pipe script > to ~/tmp, and create this

...f it's related. >> >> > >> >> > One other thing, I cannot remember asking if Apparmor or >> Selinux is >> >> > installed and enabled. >> >> > >> >> > Rowland >> >> >> >> I tried sestatus and apparmor_status and bith returned 'command not >> >> found' >> >> so I assume they're not running. I installed Debian 9 >> from the LiveCD >> >> with the cinnamon desktop. >> > >> > OK, it is late here, but just in case something has >>...

...g), I am > not entirely sure this is an apparmor issue at this point. > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@saucelabs.com> wrote: > >> Yeah, AppArmor is enabled, but I put everything (that I could find) into >> complain mode: >> >> $ sudo apparmor_status >> apparmor module is loaded. >> 12 profiles are loaded. >> 3 profiles are in enforce mode. >> lxc-container-default >> lxc-container-default-with-mounting >> lxc-container-default-with-nesting >> 9 profiles are in complain mode. >> /sbin/...

Hi Rowland, I'm the guy who had this exact issue in January, you worried extensively with me to resolve the issue. We ended up building samba from source, provisioning again (which led to rooting out remnants of the older samba release), and then you worked with me to help me get samba_backup implemented. Here's the output of the command you requested I run:

...pparmor-related log entries in kern.log), I am not entirely sure this is an apparmor issue at this point. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@saucelabs.com> wrote: > Yeah, AppArmor is enabled, but I put everything (that I could find) into > complain mode: > > $ sudo apparmor_status > apparmor module is loaded. > 12 profiles are loaded. > 3 profiles are in enforce mode. > lxc-container-default > lxc-container-default-with-mounting > lxc-container-default-with-nesting > 9 profiles are in complain mode. > /sbin/dhclient > /usr/bin/lxc-st...

On 2019-02-19 3:47 pm, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 15:25:51 -0500 >> What exactly does "START AGAIN" imply? Just chmod? > > 'ls' shows the correct ownership and Unix permissions: > > drwxrwx---+ 4 root domain admins 4096 Feb 17 19:13 programs > > But 'getfacl' show something different: > > getfacl:

I have set up an cluster with ocfs2 on top of drbd in primary/primary mode. As long as the datadir is in /var/lib/mysql, everything works fine. But as soon as I put the datadir on the ocfs2 filesystem /mnt/data/mysql mysql fails with: [Ubuntu] root at fs2:/etc# mysqld --safe-mode 090930 18:08:14 [Warning] Can't create test file /mnt/data/mysql/fs2.lower-test 090930 18:08:14 [Warning]

...s point. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@saucelabs.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, AppArmor is enabled, but I put everything (that I could find) >>>> into complain mode: >>>> >>>> $ sudo apparmor_status >>>> apparmor module is loaded. >>>> 12 profiles are loaded. >>>> 3 profiles are in enforce mode. >>>> lxc-container-default >>>> lxc-container-default-with-mounting >>>> lxc-container-default-with-nesting >>>...

Sorry, I'll gzip/attach next time. I tried pollonly and made sure no processes were hanging out. While everything comes up and seems to run happy, I still get log messages every couple of seconds, and "upsc eaton" gives me one of two messages: Error: Driver not connected ups.status: WAIT Is this actually functional? Usually I don't consider NUT operational until upsc works

I just joined a freshly installed Linux machine with Samba 4.11.6 to my Windows AD, as a domain member. Followed the Wiki to a T, domain join without errors, I can enumerate users/groups, I can create shares and work with them from Windows (all that matters to me). Unfortunately, however, I don't seem to be able to change share security settings, i.e. ACL from Windows. Whenever I do so, I get

...tart-file-bridge --daemon root 614 0.0 0.0 30724 1648 ? Ss May03 0:00 /lib/systemd/systemd-logind root 867 0.0 0.0 15260 648 ? S May03 0:00 upstart-socket-bridge --daemon Apparmor is present, but disabled due to another application's requirements: # apparmor_status apparmor module is loaded. 0 profiles are loaded. 0 profiles are in enforce mode. 0 profiles are in complain mode. 0 processes have profiles defined. 0 processes are in enforce mode. 0 processes are in complain mode. 0 processes are unconfined but have a profile defined. I couldn't find any cr...

...this is an apparmor issue at this point. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Filip Maj <fil@saucelabs.com> wrote: >> >>> Yeah, AppArmor is enabled, but I put everything (that I could find) into >>> complain mode: >>> >>> $ sudo apparmor_status >>> apparmor module is loaded. >>> 12 profiles are loaded. >>> 3 profiles are in enforce mode. >>> lxc-container-default >>> lxc-container-default-with-mounting >>> lxc-container-default-with-nesting >>> 9 profiles are in compl...