search for: app_group

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "app_group".

Did you mean: acl_group
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...01(BUILTIN\users) > > Still think they are the same user ? > > Rowland > I do ! But only when uid + gid are identical (which is not the case for your user): id samdom\\user1 uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) id user1 uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) I get exactly the same list of groups for both. - Kees.
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...user ? >> >> Rowland >> > I do ! > > But only when uid + gid are identical (which is not the case for your > user): > > id samdom\\user1 > uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) > groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain > users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) > > id user1 > uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) > groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain > users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) > > I get exactly the same list of groups for both. > > - Kees. >...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...gt;> >> I do ! >> >> But only when uid + gid are identical (which is not the case for your >> user): >> >> id samdom\\user1 >> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >> >> id user1 >> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >> >> I get exactly the same list of groups for both...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...> >>> But only when uid + gid are identical (which is not the case for your >>> user): >>> >>> id samdom\\user1 >>> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >>> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >>> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >>> >>> id user1 >>> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >>> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >>> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >>> >>> I get exactly the...
2023 May 14
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
On 14/05/2023 20:32, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > The uid + gid are the unique identifier of a user in Linux, the name is > only relevant for the translation of number (uid) to name. > > I.e. a local-user == domain-user when uid + gid are identical. > > My nsswitch.conf prefers local-users over domain-users: > > passwd:???????? files systemd winbind >
2023 May 15
1
samba users at boot, the same local and samba user bug has gone
...ly when uid + gid are identical (which is not the case for >>>> your user): >>>> >>>> id samdom\\user1 >>>> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >>>> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >>>> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >>>> >>>> id user1 >>>> uid=1114(user1) gid=1114(user1) >>>> groups=1114(user1),100(users),978(ssh-users),10000(domain >>>> users),10123(acl-app_group-access),1000001(BUILTIN\users) >>>> >&gt...
2014 Mar 21
0
mount point directory permissions
Hi I have the following problem: in a certain module I need to set permissions on a directory after the mount was executed. If I do the following file { '/app_dir': ensure => 'directory' owner => 'app_user' group => 'app_group' mode => '2775' } mount { '/app_dir': ensure => mounted, atboot => true, device => /dev/mapper/lv_app, fstype => ext3, options => 'defaults', dump => '1', pass => '2', require => File['/app_dir'], }...