Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "aporee".
2019 Jul 31
2
SSL-Question
Thank you for reply. And in wich folder put tig PEM file
V V sre., 31. jul. 2019 ob 16:04 je oseba unosonic <un at aporee.org> napisala:
> Ervin Bizjak:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Where do I find tutorial how to install and setup ssl and which
> certificate
> > is for icecast?
>
>
>
> hi, don't know if there's info esp.on SSL,
>
> I've just compiled icecast 2.4.4...
2005 May 09
2
win media player prob
Leo Currie:
> This link might be useful:
> http://gonze.com/playlists/playlist-format-survey.html
>
hi leo,
thanks for the link, it's definitely useful.
meanwhile i doubt that it's a mime-type problem.
i've made some php-scripts with different header and
mime-type output, makes no difference. wmp buffers until
the doctor comes... xmms plays obviously anything...
i've
2018 Jan 23
2
Now playing (PHP example)
Wow, thank you so much! I completely forgot about the status-json.xsl file... :D
2018-01-23 15:38 GMT+01:00, unosonic <un at aporee.org>:
> Danijela Popović:
>> Hi all,
>> Basically there's my question in the subject. I need a simple example
>> of now playing artist, song, and listeners. Can somebody write it down
>> for me?
>
> no time, sorry
> http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/se...
2004 Aug 06
0
How do I unsubscribe!
...or 2 weeks nw - at least
20 requests using the right email addy etc - please, remove me from the
list, I realise this is not suppsed to be the place to ask BUT nothing else
has worked.
phr33k@i4free.co.nz is the emal addy.
Zac
<p>----- Original Message -----
From: "udo noll" <un@aporee.org>
To: <icecast@xiph.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: [icecast] icecast security
<p>>
> hello,
> maybe an outdated question: there was a message on the
> securityfocus mailing list (bugtraq) today (and several month before)
> about a remote buf...
2005 May 09
1
win media player prob
un@dom.de wrote:
>>i've also linked the stream into dir.xiph.org for testing,
>>it shows up, when i click the link, wmp buffers... :(
>
>
> if someone would like to check:
> http://dir.xiph.org/index.php?sgenre=&stype=&search=aporee
> (don't care about the content ;)
> thx, u.
You seem to be streaming at all sorts of different bitrates...
I'm guessing WMP is expecting content at 128k, but recieving only 64k or
96k, hence the rebuffering.
I have no idea why the server is reporting 128k though... :(
Leo
2016 Mar 29
2
Requirements Icecast
Hi , I searched within your page but not meeting the minimum requirements
for proper operation of Icecast . What are the minimum hardware
requirements you need Icecast to operate properly? Best regards
--
Sebastian David Piñero Agüero
Ingeniero SEC Clase A
Ejecución Eléctrica, Electrónica
Redes & Telecomunicaciones
Tecnólogo en Telecomunicaciones
Universidad de Santiago de Chile
2018 Jan 23
2
Now playing (PHP example)
Hi all,
Basically there's my question in the subject. I need a simple example
of now playing artist, song, and listeners. Can somebody write it down
for me?
I tried so many ways to do this task, but nothing worked for me.
Best regards,
Daniela
2018 Jan 23
0
Now playing (PHP example)
...povic
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 11:44 AM
To: Icecast streaming server user discussions <icecast at xiph.org>
Subject: Re: [Icecast] Now playing (PHP example)
Wow, thank you so much! I completely forgot about the status-json.xsl file... :D
2018-01-23 15:38 GMT+01:00, unosonic <un at aporee.org>:
> Danijela Popović:
>> Hi all,
>> Basically there's my question in the subject. I need a simple example
>> of now playing artist, song, and listeners. Can somebody write it
>> down for me?
>
> no time, sorry
> http://icecast.org/docs/icecast-2.4.1/...
2019 Jul 31
2
SSL-Question
Hello!
Where do I find tutorial how to install and setup ssl and which certificate
is for icecast?
Thank you
V V sre., 31. jul. 2019 ob 15:13 je oseba Per Gunnarsson <
per.gunnarsson at yandex.com> napisala:
> I have one listening socket for http and one separate for https.
>
> It looks like this:
>
>
> <listen-socket>
>
2020 Mar 11
1
SSL Question
AFIK, pem is simply
1. private key
2. (most specific) certificate
3. intermediate certificates, if any
in this order.
at least such a pem work for my icecast 2.4 w/o problems
--u
Gavin Stephens:
>
> > > The error message I was getting in the Icecast log was about no
> > > compatible ssl port. I assumed this was something more complex than a
> > > bad
2016 Nov 10
1
got icecast2 working, but hear nothing
plug in your 302 USB
enter: lsusb
you should see: Bus 001 Device 005: ID 08bb:2902 Texas Instruments Japan PCM2902 Audio Codec
look at syslog:
...
usb 1-1.2: new full-speed USB device number 5 using dwc_otg
usb 1-1.2: New USB device found, idVendor=08bb, idProduct=2902
usb 1-1.2: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
usb 1-1.2: Product: USB Audio CODEC
usb 1-1.2:
2004 Aug 06
4
icecast security
hello,
maybe an outdated question: there was a message on the
securityfocus mailing list (bugtraq) today (and several month before)
about a remote buffer overflow in icecast v1.3.10 (which seems to be a
package in debian).
does this affect 1.3.11 too or is the version at
http://www.icecast.org/download.html fixed?
thanks, uno
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
2015 May 13
1
Regarding edcast with icecast2.4
Geoff Shang:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Jonathan wrote:
> > mountpoint level security settings. The problem that I'm seeing here is
> > edcast does not allow a source username to be passed through.
>
> Either delete the username or comment it out like so:
> <!-- <username>hackme</username> -->
slightly OT, but you could also consider to use butt:
2020 Aug 27
1
debian 10 package /w ssl?
hi,
I've installed icecast2 from http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/multimedia:/xiph/Debian_10/
because I need url_auth. But I also need SSL, but the proviced icecast doesn't have it:
"No SSL capability"
Why??
Do I really need to recompile it? Should be default, imho... no?
bests, u
2020 Nov 24
2
switch a source, idea?
hi there,
let's say I have a mountpoint /important with a source a, and a mountpoint /notimportant with source b
now I have to switch source a and b so that the content of source b plays on mountpoint /important
mountpoint /notimportant is, well, not so important
of course I can do it manually, but I wonder if there is a trick to accomplish that
programmatically or within icecast. ideas
2018 Mar 14
0
IceCast Listenter Count Stat - BASH or php?
just parse status-json.xsl with php's curl/json_parse...
ScanCaster:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 22:07:34 +0100, Jeroen van Oosten wrote:
>
> > Well, you can create your own XSL with less data. I use this (as
> > web/simple.xsl):
>
> Well since I don't know XSL, BASH etc. was my go to choice...
>
> BUT...
>
> Doing this gets
> 404's from a
2019 Jul 31
2
SSL-Question
thanks, that makes sense and works!
btw: is port 8443 sort of standard, which clients do consider?
bests, uno
Per Gunnarsson:
> I have one listening socket for http and one separate for https.
>
> It looks like this:
>
>
> <listen-socket>
> <port>8000</port>
> </listen-socket>
>
>
>
>
2004 Aug 06
2
launching icecast/ices from webinterface
hello,
i'm starting/stopping icecast (1.3.11) & ices (0.2.2) from a
web interface. fine so far, but now i see strange things:
both ices & icecast, once started , (ices -B ... , icecast -b ...),
both processes and their childs are listening also
to port 80, besides their normal operation.
i've found out because apache didn't restart (Address already in use:
make_sock: could
2019 Jul 31
3
SSL-Question
hello,
I've icecast 2.4.4 /w SSL support, and when i enable SSL in the config file:
<ssl>1</ssl>
and
<ssl-certificate>my-all-inlusive.pem</ssl-certificate>
I can connect via https://my-server:8000/my_stream
but only via https, no longer http. Is there an option to have both?
Also my source clients seems to be unableto connect anymore via http,
but have to look
2019 Jul 31
4
SSL-Question
Thomas B. Rücker:
> After all, Icecast is just another web server.
>
> Please note the absence of 8000 and 8443. Neither are officially
> specified for WWW type HTTP(S). They are commonly used as such, but 80
> and 443 are *much* better choices and should be preferred.
makes sense, but if my webserver needs to serve http/s from the same IP,
that would not work. Unless I want to