search for: aplha

Dear List I'm trying to run R on a DIGITAL Alpha / Linux RedHat 7.2 The .rpm requires libreadlin.so.4.1 RedHat 7.2 comes with libreadline.so.4.2 I installed the R-1.6.0-1.aplha.rpm with option --nodeps, since it otherwise complained that the required libreadline.so.4.1 was missing. This seemed to be the only unsatisfied dependency, at least that was the only one mentioned when installing without the --nodeps option. I then made a link /usr/lib/libreadline.so.4.1 to point...

...quot; for sales people) FWIW the context were large "old-school" corps (like Novell or Oracle) taking over free software companies. > that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would Define "true Linux distribution". > not include half baken and aplha quality sofwtare again and again in > stable releases because "the market out there" That's everywhere in the commercial world the problem with "delivery vs quality/known problems" and someone's decision to ship or not to ship - based in whatever feels appropriate....

On Don, 2015-03-26 at 17:01 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > On 26/03/15 13:05, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:08 +0200, Andreas Kasenides wrote: > >> I am usually emotionally (at least) against of open-source projects > >> loosing their independence to large corporations. Possibly due to bad > > OX-AG is a "large corporation"?

Hello! I recently upgraded from dovecot 0.9x to 1.0.5-Aplha and now when ever folders are opened (in IMAP), it keeps saying invalid mbox files. It worked fine in 0.99.x. It is detecting the right mbox files because it lists the folders and the subscriptions correctly. I am using "default_mail_env = mbox:~/mail/:INBOX=/var/mail/%u" in the config f...

...software/OSS just happens that *at > least* half of it should come from the "working level" and that is - at > least - much more - ahemm - "inconvenient" for sales people) that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would not include half baken and aplha quality sofwtare again and again in stable releases because "the market out there" the *possible* long-term benefits are more time to invest because a fixed income -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-s...

...= server password server = XYZ Using the "tests" in John Blair's Samba book, I pass ALL but test 9. The user log file contains: password server XYZ rejected the password NT Password did not match ! Defaulting to Lanman I can pass test 9 if I use a user name which exists on the DEC Aplha server, but like the other Samba servers, I want to use our NT PDC (XYZ) for user authentication. I would also like to use our NT BDC for backup authentication. Is the smb.conf entry: "password server = serv1 serv2" or is there a comma separating the names? One interesting thing is the c...

...or Oracle) > taking over free software companies. > >> that is simple not true - if it would be true linux distributions would > > Define "true Linux distribution". who the fuck was talking abiut "true Linux distribution"? >> not include half baken and aplha quality sofwtare again and again in >> stable releases because "the market out there" > > That's everywhere in the commercial world the problem with "delivery vs > quality/known problems" and someone's decision to ship or not to ship - > based in whatev...

Having avoided them for some time now, based on compatibility concerns as I began to learn and use Linux full time, I?ve recently gotten the urge to start playing around with some 64-bit distro?s. The benefit of course is running more than the 4Gb (system-wide) limit imposed by a 32-bit OS. In my current system I only have 2Gb (2x1Gb) of RAM so I?m thinking of either adding 4Gb (2x2Gb) or even