search for: apfelq

Hi Alexander, On Mon, 17 Apr 2023 08:19:59 +0200, Alexander Harm || ApfelQ via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I did setup shadow_copy2 with BTRFS snapshots. While this works fine for directories Windows does not show any previous versions for files. I couldn?t find anything regarding this, only one other using complaining about this in the OMV forums. Is this expect...

Hello Mike, I know from my customers that moving files under macOS Ventura on a SMB share is a mess and completely broken by Apple (e. g. moved files cannot be opened until you reconnect). Unfortunately I do not have a ZFS-backed machine to test against available right now to confirm the behaviour. Is your order of "vfs objects? correct? Regards, Alexander > On Thursday, Mar 02, 2023 at

...authentication. e. g. production WLAN needs LDAP group "wlan_production" and management WLAN needs the "wlan_management" group. I guess post_auth may be the correct place for that. You've helped tremendously, thanks again! Am 12.04.23 um 13:20 schrieb Alexander Harm || ApfelQ: > Hi Matthias, > > we?re using Debian Bullseye with the backports repo. So version is a > mixture of > > -?Samba version 4.17.3-Debian > -?Samba version 4.17.7-Debian > > We?ve installed it directly on the DC?s as well. > > In my opinion using ?"ntlm auth = y...

...nge results in the same error message above. > > Any help would be much appreciated, otherwise we're going to switch to > SQL or file based auth (with cleartext password *shudder*). > > Thanks and have a nice day, Matthias. > > Am 06.04.23 um 09:56 schrieb Alexander Harm || ApfelQ via samba: > > I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: > > > > ## 4 FreeRADIUS > > > > ### 4.1 Basics > > > > ```bash > > apt install freera...

Hello, I did setup shadow_copy2 with BTRFS snapshots. While this works fine for directories Windows does not show any previous versions for files. I couldn?t find anything regarding this, only one other using complaining about this in the OMV forums. Is this expected behaviour? Regards, Alexander

Out of curiosity: is QNAP as bad as Synology or is there another ?mainstream? NAS solution with more vanilla Samba out there? Alexander On 25. March 2020 at 11:40:08, Ralph Boehme via samba (samba at lists.samba.org) wrote: Am 3/25/20 um 11:36 AM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: > Thanks Ralph, didn't know that, but shouldn't they provide source code > somewhere ? they

...Using ntlm_auth with --challenge results in the same error message above. Any help would be much appreciated, otherwise we're going to switch to SQL or file based auth (with cleartext password *shudder*). Thanks and have a nice day, Matthias. Am 06.04.23 um 09:56 schrieb Alexander Harm || ApfelQ via samba: > I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: > > ## 4 FreeRADIUS > > ### 4.1 Basics > > ```bash > apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils &g...

...snapdir = /srv/glvol_samba/admin/projects/.snaps ??????? shadow:basedir = /srv/glvol_samba/admin/projects ??????? shadow:sort = desc ??????? vfs objects = acl_xattr shadow_copy2 glusterfs_fuse ??????? shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S Am 22.05.2023 um 15:13 schrieb Alexander Harm || ApfelQ: > Hi Sebastian, > > why are you using?shadow:snapprefix if this is just ?snap?? > > Does it work using ONLY shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S ? > > If you use snapprefix you also need to use?shadow:delimiter (in your > case this would be ?_?). However, I never man...

Hi Sebastian, why are you using shadow:snapprefix if this is just ?snap?? Does it work using ONLY shadow:format = snap_GMT-%Y.%m.%d-%H.%M.%S ? If you use snapprefix you also need to use shadow:delimiter (in your case this would be ?_?). However, I never managed to get it working with snapprefix on my machines. Alexander > On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 2:52 PM, Sebastian Neustein via samba

I can share my notes, we authenticate UniFi clients via Freeradius against Samba AD. We also check group membership which you might or might not need: ## 4 FreeRADIUS ### 4.1 Basics ```bash apt install freeradius freeradius-ldap freeradius-utils # create new DH-params openssl dhparam -out /etc/freeradius/3.0/certs/dh 2048 ``` ### 4.2 Configure Authentication - modify mschap to use winbind,

Last week we finally upgraded our servers from Samba 3 to Samba 4 and so far everything runs smoothly. For now we run 4.15.13 with an old NT-style domain while we are preparing to migrate to Samba AD-style domain. Since the upgrade we have the issue that the logon scripts are not executed for domain users. It works a 100% for domain admins and 0% for non admin users and we have no idea why. We

Samba DC: # Global parameters [global] log level = 1 auth_audit:3 netbios name = KA-H9-DC01 realm = DS.EXAMPLE.COM server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = EXAMPLE dns forwarder = 10.0.1.100 10.0.1.110 ntlm auth = mschapv2-and-ntlmv2-only tls enabled = yes tls keyfile = tls/ka-h9-dc01.key tls certfile = tls/ka-h9-dc01.crt tls

We have to Samba DCs and a couple of Synology NAS connected/bound to the Samba AD. On regular basis the Synology NAS (I believe Samba 4.4.16) looses its connection to the AD outputting the error message, that the domain cannot be found. In the logs of the NAS I can only find the error message ?synowin: domain_test_join.c:59 net ads test join fail?. In the logs of the DC I notice that from one