search for: ap_suexec_umask

...d a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the > culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. > > The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and > SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in > support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it > will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set > via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. > > In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the > httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags...

...>>> the >>> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >>> >>> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI >>> and >>> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >>> support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, >>> it >>> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is >>> set >>> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >>> >>> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the >>> h...

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script for systemd. And that doesn't make any difference. Any suggestion from

...ke any difference. I had a couple sideline emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related configuration flags are notably absent of --...

...emails with Emmett about suexec possibly being the >> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >> >> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI and >> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >> support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, it >> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is set >> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >> >> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.src.rpm the >> httpd.spec for ./configure with suexec-related...

...t;>> culprit.? TL;DR: that's not it. >>>> >>>> The apache suexec utility can enforce a umask (typically 022) on CGI >>>> and >>>> SSI (server-side includes).? Taking a look at the source in >>>> support/suexec.c, if compiled with AP_SUEXEC_UMASK set to some value, >>>> it >>>> will set the umask; else there is no umask change.? AP_SUEXEC_UMASK is >>>> set >>>> via ./configure with --with-suexec-umask. >>>> >>>> In CentOS 8 httpd-2.4.37-21.module_el8.2.0+382+15b0afa8.sr...