search for: anytyp

...essage name="MassBank_Simple_2Response"> <wsdl:part name="MassBank_Simple_2Return" type="soapenc:string"/> </wsdl:message> <wsdl:message name="MassBank_Simple_2Request"> <wsdl:part name="data" type="xsd:anyType"/> </wsdl:message> <wsdl:portType name="MassBank_Simple_2Impl"> <wsdl:operation name="MassBank_Simple_2" parameterOrder="data"> <wsdl:input message="impl:MassBank_Simple_2Request" name="MassBank_Simple_2...

...a record) with another dag​. I haven't touched !subst, but I have a similar issue with !dag. One of the things I've been thinking about (but haven't actually done) is that we should perhaps make the type lattice complete, by making UnsetInit typed with a new UnsetType, and adding an AnyType. I ran into this mostly because it would make sense for !dag(op, childnodes, childnodenames) to de facto have the type !dag(any, list<any> or unset, list<string> or unset), or perhaps !dag(anyrecord, list<any> or unset, list<string> or unset). > ​- I want some sort...

...opsys.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > TDM is not limited to voice. But there are better ways of moving data > across an ethernet segment. > > Look at the various treads recently about TDMoE. > > Make sure you are using a separate card for anytype of non-testing load. > Use a 2.6 based kernel, Better networking. > Pick a religion and follow it, you with need a bit a divine > intervention..... > > > > ________________________________ > > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-boun...

In all the information on Asterisk it takes about TDMoE to link asterisk servers together. Is this IAX??? How would I use TDMoE. Maybe my first question should be, What is it??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20030516/cd74bddb/attachment.htm

...in; charset="us-ascii" > > > > TDM is not limited to voice. But there are better ways of > moving data > > across an ethernet segment. > > > > Look at the various treads recently about TDMoE. > > > > Make sure you are using a separate card for anytype of > non-testing load. > > Use a 2.6 based kernel, Better networking. > > Pick a religion and follow it, you with need a bit a divine > > intervention..... > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: asterisk-users-bounce...

...​. > > I haven't touched !subst, but I have a similar issue with !dag. > > One of the things I've been thinking about (but haven't actually done) > is that we should perhaps make the type lattice complete, by making > UnsetInit typed with a new UnsetType, and adding an AnyType. > > I ran into this mostly because it would make sense for !dag(op, > childnodes, childnodenames) to de facto have the type !dag(any, > list<any> or unset, list<string> or unset), or perhaps !dag(anyrecord, > list<any> or unset, list<string> or unset). >...

On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:26 AM Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > While working on some features for the AMDGPU backend -- specifically, > explicit address components for image intrinsics, which involves > generating both > > (a) a lot of intrinsics with different but somewhat regular parameter > types, and > > (b) the patterns to

Hi all, While working on some features for the AMDGPU backend -- specifically, explicit address components for image intrinsics, which involves generating both (a) a lot of intrinsics with different but somewhat regular parameter types, and (b) the patterns to select instructions for those intrinsics -- I got fed up with a lot of the TableGen bugs and limitations and set out to fix things.