search for: anycase

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 44 matches for "anycase".

2004 Nov 03
4
libspeex for other platforms
wouldn't it be a good idea to have the libraray available as a binary for non-PC platforms like the PocketPC, Symbian and Mac? i am suggesting this as it will allow the developers to go ahead and program to an interface while the development continues. there are builds for symbian, pocket pc and linux already in the tar ball. putting their binaries on the download section will probably
2011 Jun 08
1
Fwd: removing windows 2003 from samba4&In-Reply-To=<4DEDC91A.3080706@samba.org>
Hello Matthieu, >Did you wait for a couple of minutes (1 or 2 hours maybe) for the sync >to settle ? also did you transfer roles to the samba4 DC ? > >In anycase you should restart samba with a higher log level so that we >can have more information. > >If needed pop up in #samba-technical for more real time support. > >Matthieu. I've restarted samba with log level 5, above is what i've see ( full log is to big ) sync appears to be d...
2005 Dec 20
4
rsync deleting symbolic link unexpectedly
I''m running 2.6.6 on a red hat EL3 system. using the following command, rsync -rlptDvzL --stats --include=a/ --include=a/dir/ --include=a/dir/symlink/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/ --include=a/dir/symlink/dir2/dir3/ --exclude=''**'' /export/stuff remote::stuff I expect the "symlink" (which is really a symbolic link to a directory) to be preserved on the
2004 Jun 01
5
OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15
2004 Jun 01
5
OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
Dear All... I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, herewith is my environment details : 1. We are using RHAS 2.1 with kernel 2.4.9-e.27 Enterprise 2. OCFS version : 2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.9-6 3. Oracle RDBMS : 9.2.0.4 RAC with 5 Nodes 4. Storage = EVA 6000 with 8 TB SIZE 5. We have 1 DiskGroup and 51 LUNs configured in EVA6000. My Question is : 1. It takes arround 15
2009 May 29
1
Backpropagation to adjust weights in a neural net when receiving new training examples
...he weights in the already created nn. I'm using nnet package, I know that nn$wts gives the weights, but I cant find out which weights belong to which conections so I could implement the backpropagation algorithm myself. But if anyone knows some function to do this, it would be even better. In anycase, thank you! Filipe Rocha [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Jun 07
7
wrr question
Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently
2004 Apr 16
1
Problem on choosing the OCFS version for RH 2.1
Hi All, The Linux version of the machine on which I want to install OCFS is: $uname -r 2.4.9-e.25kmap1enterprise Can any body suggest me which version and the module of OCFS should I install. The machine on which I want to install has 2-CPUs. Thanks, Ayush
2006 Nov 16
2
Full Virtualization Windows XP Network Question
Folks, I am running SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10.1 with Xen. I have an Intel CPU with full virtualization enabled. I am able to install Windows XP as a fully virtualized GUEST, but I am having problem getting it to see the NIC that SLES 10 sees. Bill Morris _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2002 Mar 07
0
[Bug 147] New: ssh dies if it gets SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ
...Q, if the users password has expired draft-ietf-secsh-userauth-15.txt: Section 5 says: Normally, the server responds to this message with success or failure. However, if the password has expired the server SHOULD indicate this by responding with SSH_MSG_USERAUTH_PASSWD_CHANGEREQ. In anycase the server MUST NOT allow an expired password to be used for authentication. OpenSSH sshd is compilant with MUST NOT part but doesn't do the SHOULD. If PAM is used on platforms that support it then the correct thing happens since pam_chauthtok is run later on and if that fails the session...
2002 Oct 16
0
Possible memory leak?
...])); and return flist. Then we go on to use flist->, but there doesn't ever appear to be a free of that memory. client_run() returns, and the pointer is lost. I tried to fix it with a simple free(), but according to valgrind, that makes to leak worse, for reasons I am confused about. In anycase, does this look like a problem? Brad - -- http://linux.conf.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Aust. I'm registered. Are you? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9rWArW6pHgIdAuOMRAoZWAKC2JqowLCH5lVPFzzVltOdXxjk2+QCgnB6U Cdp...
2004 Feb 27
1
PDC newbie
...amba-3.0.2rc1-1 and it works just fine (mainly). Still, there is a question that bugs me a lot: can Samba work with NT style permissions, on directory level, NOT share level? Linux filesystems can work with 3 entities for permissions, right? User, Group, All - RWX. NT can have multiple permissions (anycase, more than 3) on each directory or file, but Samba works with only 3, mentioned above. What if I want to give the 4th user permission on a file? As a hint, mapping groups GID <-> SID can help solving the problem I just mentioned? I know that I can define permissions for as many users/groups...
2011 Jun 07
1
removing windows 2003 from samba4
Hello! I've setup last version of samba on git repositories, Samba version 4.0.0alpha16-GIT-43ab5aa and joined a windows 2003 as a additional domain controller, but when i try to remove these domain controller with dcpromo command appears the following error on log.samba: [2011/06/07 00:18:55, 0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/drepl_out_helpers.c:765(dreplsrv_update_refs_done) UpdateRefs failed
2002 Dec 13
0
HTB bug?
...e right now (no messages to tty) and each time I didn''t actually check the serial console. I know this isn''t a very useful bug report (will try to get something more useful later on), but I just want to know if somebody else have experienced the same kind of behaviour lately. In anycase, I''ve removed all the rules from the machine and is going to just to QoS on our Cisco routers again until I resolve the problem :P -- Regards Abraham Real programmers don''t write in BASIC. Actually, no programmers write in BASIC after reaching puberty. _____________________...
2018 Apr 02
1
[Bug 1240] New: logrotate: file size changed while zipping
...ot this email from cron: > /etc/cron.daily/logrotate: > error: Compressing program wrote following message to stderr when > compressing log /var/log/ulog/syslogemu.log.1: > gzip: stdin: file size changed while zipping I suspect last log entries are lost. This is an unwanted message in anycase. One solution would be to add delaycompress in the logrotate script, I suppose. Cheers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-bugl...
2005 Aug 30
2
Wierd Problem
Hi All I have posted this problem many times on the list but no reply, trying one more time may be someone will response this time When I call from 1 RTC Client to another without Asterisk everything use to be fine but when asterisk is there as a Registrar a problem use to occur in more than 90% calls, Caller can hear the voice of the receiving side but the receiver cant be able to hear the
2003 Oct 24
0
Samba 2.2.8 and NFS together?
...using Samba on the CBT side is that we are using domain security and the CBT's can't see the domain controllers, and have generic userids that are not set up in the domain. On the Admin PC side we are requiring that all users accessing the server must be authenticated by the domain. In anycase, I'm having great difficulty in figuring out what is happening here. Any assistance would be most appreciated, and more info can be provided upon request (as I'm sure I've left something out that may/may not be important). TIA, Clarke Epperly cepperly@earthlink.net
2003 Nov 27
0
Please help: Samba 2.2.8 question.
...Samba on the CBT side is that we are using domain security and the CBT's can't see the domain controllers, and have generic userids that are not set up in the domain. On the Admin PC side we are requiring that all users accessing the server must be authenticated by the domain. In anycase, I'm having great difficulty in figuring out what is happening here. Any assistance would be most appreciated, and more info can be provided upon request (as I'm sure I've left something out that may/may not be important). TIA, Clarke Epperly cepperly@earthlink.net
2003 Oct 29
0
Samba 2.2.8 and NFS: Redux
...Samba on the CBT side is that we are using domain security and the CBT's can't see the domain controllers, and have generic userids that are not set up in the domain. On the Admin PC side we are requiring that all users accessing the server must be authenticated by the domain. In anycase, I'm having great difficulty in figuring out what is happening here. Any assistance would be most appreciated, and more info can be provided upon request (as I'm sure I've left something out that may/may not be important). TIA, Clarke Epperly cepperly@earthlink.net
2004 Jun 02
3
AW: OCFS 1.0.9-6 performance with EVA 6000 Storage
...That will > reduce the hb related io. > > If you want to use 51 mounts, make sure your hardware can handle the io. > For e.g., if you see ocfs msgs like, "Removing nodes" and "Adding nodes" > without a node performing any mount/umount, you have a problem. In > anycase, you should use 1.0.11 at the least. In 1.0.10, we doubled the > timeout from 1.0.9. > > Hope this helps. > Sunil > > On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 18:04, Jeram wrote: > > Dear All... > > > > I need some information regarding OCFS performance in my Linux Box, > her...