Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "anwher".
Did you mean:
anwhere
2005 May 31
1
Uniden UIP1868 - any sightings or users?
I've been looking out for the Uniden UIP1868 for a while now, but I
haven't seen it anwhere that I'm used to buying things from. According
to froogle, a couple of places (that I've never heard of) have a small
number in stock (small = 10 in this case). I'm doubly suspicious
because even uniden's own online store doesn't have them available yet,
not to mention re...
2004 Aug 02
1
Theroa Guess Confirmation
...tride*8/y_width = num bits per Y component
3) "theora_encode_header" must be called exactly once, and its output
must be the first packet received by a Theora decoder
4) "theora_encode_comment" need never be called, but can be called at
any time, and its packet can be inserted anwhere
5) "theroa_encode_tables" must be called exactly once, and its output
must be the first non-comment packet after the header
6) "theora_encode_YUVin" must be called once per frame, and its output
added to the stream in a sequential manner
7) Theora can tolerate any number of...
2015 Jul 09
4
[LLVMdev] readonly and infinite loops
Here's a fun spin on this same topic (I can't file a bug at this
moment since llvm.org is down).
Consider:
define i32 @x(i32* %x, i1* %y) {
entry:
br label %loop
loop:
%v = phi i32 [ 0 , %entry ], [ %v.inc, %exit.inner ], [ %v, %loop ]
%c = load volatile i1, i1* %y
br i1 %c, label %exit.inner, label %loop
exit.inner:
%c1 = load volatile i1, i1* %y
%x.val = load i32, i32*
2024 Oct 17
1
Is there any easy way to set some default rsync options?
On Wed 16 Oct 2024, Chris Green via rsync wrote:
>
> I use it almost exclusively on Linux systems and it would be really
> handy if I could set a number of options which would always be used
> when I run rsync. These would be in addition to -a which is useful
> but not quite enough.
>
> In particular I always want to copy extended attributes (-X), ACLs
> (-A) and
2006 Jun 01
2
Kernel update = slower ?
This is really strange. Day before, I updated the machine here (x86_64)
and all went normal. I rebooted, and everything came back just as I
expected. Next morning, I noticed one of my jobs during the night had
finished, but finished late by about 8 or 9 minutes. I really didn't
think much of it, but after looking at jobs running today, I'm seeing
the same thing. Processes that
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote:
>* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
>
>
>>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other
>>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself
>>must have live segments
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote:
>* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
>
>
>>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other
>>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself
>>must have live segments