search for: anupama

...oint here, but is my understanding correct that even assuming that the case function is always inlined so we don't have extra function call overhead, we have the redundant if (!Result) checks when we use StringSwitch as opposed to a bunch of if- elses. Thanks. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Anupama Chandrasekhar < anupama.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > The point I was wondering about is, say in the example, say the input > string is "de" > > int i = StringSwitch<int>("de") > .case("de", 1) > .case("fghi", 2) > .case(&quot...

Hi: I have a question about the llvm StringSwitch class. Why is this more efficient than comparing the hashes of the strings or just using a bunch of if statements. Anupama -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160205/9be0fcc8/attachment.html>

Hi: I was wondering where I can find more information about LLVM's new licensing that was mentioned at the dev meeting and is scheduled to take effect from Feb 2018. Thanks, Anupama -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20171108/7703217c/attachment.html>

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 4:42 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > >> On Feb 5, 2016, at 2:43 PM, Anupama Chandrasekhar via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >> I have a question about the llvm StringSwitch class. Why is this more efficient than comparing the hashes of the strings or just using a bunch of if statements. > > I don't know...

unsubscribe Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations --------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** Legal Disclaimer **************************** "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is