Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "antlists".
Did you mean:
analista
2020 Jun 20
2
Inclusive language in LLVM: can we rename `master` branch?
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:55 PM antlists via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 19/06/2020 20:43, Matt Arsenault via llvm-dev wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Jun 19, 2020, at 15:38, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev
> >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrot...
2020 Jul 15
2
Inclusive language in LLVM: can we rename `master` branch?
...; which is the German word for master.
Master isn't racist, and has never been in this context. If you just go on
with this, you'll allow random people to connotate any word the way they
like and how they see fit. You'll weaponize every word.
Am Mo., 22. Juni 2020 um 22:00 Uhr schrieb antlists via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
> On 21/06/2020 11:20, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote:
> > Words have many meanings in one single language. But English is not
> > just one language. To begin with, it's spoken natively in many
> > countries and totally di...
2020 Jun 19
2
Inclusive language in LLVM: can we rename `master` branch?
On 19/06/2020 12:56, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote:
> I never associated any of those words with their negative
> connotations, either, but this is because of my upbringing and some of
> the privileges I enjoy from our broken society.
>
> I always associated the word "master" as reverential, like with
> martial arts, Jedi kind of thing. And to me, "white"
2020 Jun 19
4
Inclusive language in LLVM: can we rename `master` branch?
> On Jun 19, 2020, at 15:38, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> I'm interested to hear more about the actual problem Matt perceives with respect to the release actually: why should the release have any impact with the development branch?
>
That was just an example of a concrete time. Other transitions requiring wide coordination have had some
2020 Jun 21
2
Inclusive language in LLVM: can we rename `master` branch?
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 02:00, Lang Hames via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> If the bar for removal / renaming is "Use of X is offensive", or "Use of X is clearly impacting contributors or potential contributors" then I'm all for it. If the bar is "Nobody has actually complained, but X could be mistaken for something offensive" that seems
2020 Oct 01
4
[RFC] Backend for Motorola 6800 series CPU (M68k)
Its awesome to see so much progress on this!
A very minor question - why is it called M680x0 and not M68K given
that's what the target arch/triple is and how its usually referred to?
Sorry for the bikeshedding....
Simon.
On 30/09/2020 21:14, Min-Yih Hsu via llvm-dev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've composed a draft roadmap for this new target. I've decided to try
>