search for: antithet

Hi all, Is it possible to run cronjobs configured by a user to run only when he/she is logged (via GDM/KDM,etc.)? Thanks.

...eans and how to resolve this issue (cannot change value of locked binding for ). Please suggest > mc = MonteCarloOption(dt = 1/360, pathLength = 30, mcSteps = 5000, mcLoops = + 50, init = TRUE, innovations.gen = sobolInnovations, path.gen = wienerPath, + payoff.calc = arithmeticAsianPayoff, antithetic = TRUE, standardization = + FALSE, trace = TRUE, scrambling = 2, seed = 4711) Error in MonteCarloOption(dt = 1/360, pathLength = 30, mcSteps = 5000, : cannot change value of locked binding for 'dt' > Thanks in advance Sayonara With Smile & With Warm Regards :-)...

...OptBisect, I have a few thoughts: 1) what's the purpose of the virtual interface/OptPassGate? I'm guessing maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. 2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be more suitable for that grouping (the scope for the bisection) to be API driven - passing the bisector into the LLVMContext ctor to define the set of contexts that share...

I second this. I find it rather ironic that one would try to initiate discussion of an open source operating system and environment in a proprietary walled off world. This seems rather antithetical to the whole intent of centos. - Richard ------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Monday, October 09, 2017 12:14:55 +0100 > From: Nux! <nux at li.nux.ro> > > I personally dislike Facebook, but even so, I think a basic > requirement for any web site striving...

...ughts: > > 1) what's the purpose of the virtual interface/OptPassGate? I'm guessing > maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these APIs? hmm, no, I > suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. > > 2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty antithetical to > the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be bisecting over multiple > LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be more suitable for that grouping > (the scope for the bisection) to be API driven - passing the bisector into > the LLVMContext ctor to define the set of...

David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> 於 2020年1月6日 週一 下午2:23寫道： > If this is something that can vary per file in a compilation and resolve > correctly when one object file is built with one ABI and another object > file is built with a different ABI (that seems to be antithetical to the > concept of "ABI" Though) - then it should be a subtarget feature. > > ABI is generally something that has to be agreed upon across object files > - so it wouldn't make sense to link two object files with two different > ABIs. What's going on here that m...

...nguage (such as Rust or Julia[1]) which uses RAII to manage resources and tries to interface with R. It doesn't seem a productive way forward for R to say it can't interface with these languages without first doing expensive copies into an intermediate heap. The advice to avoid C++ is also antithetical to John Chambers vision of first S and R as a interface language (from Extending R [2]) > The *interface* principle has always been central to R and to S before. An interface to subroutines was _the_ way to extend the first version of S. Subroutine interfaces have continued to be central...

Andrew, I would not make the caller pass the description of the IR unit. That is because it would result in the description generated every time even if OptBisect is disabled. Description generation is not very chip. Thinking on the OptBisect extension, I believe passing the units are the right choice because OptPassGates may use them to make pass skipping decisions. -Yevgeny Rouban

Hi all. There are two steps in LTO codegen so the problem is how to pass ABI info into LTO code generator. The easier way is pass -target-abi via option to LTO codegen, but there is linking issue when linking two bitcodes generated by different -mabi option. (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D71387#1792169) Usually the ABI info for a file is derived from target triple, mcpu or -mabi, but in RISC-V,

...: > >     1) what's the purpose of the virtual interface/OptPassGate? I'm guessing maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. > >     2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be more suitable for that grouping (the scope for the bisection) to be API driven - passing the bisector into the LLVMContext ctor to define the set of contexts that sh...

...hat's the purpose of the virtual interface/OptPassGate? I'm > guessing maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these > APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. > > > > 2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty > antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be > bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be more > suitable for that grouping (the scope for the bisection) to be API > driven - passing the bisector into the LLVMContext ctor to define the > set of...

...e ------------ > Date: Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:26:01 +0000 > From: "C.L. Martinez" <carlopmart at gmail.com> > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to run cronjobs configured by a user to run only > when he/she is logged (via GDM/KDM,etc.)? > Seems a little antithetical, so you may want to provide more details on what the issues are and what you are trying to accomplish. That said, the cron job being run could include a bit of code at the top to check the user's logged in status and run or abort accordingly. A different approach would be to use cron.den...

...that. I understand that the problem may be that bootstrapping such a small data set is insane, but I'm just copying Efron and Tibshirani (who do this with lmsreg). So the problem may be only that more informative error messages are needed (or failure codes, although failure codes are somewhat antithetical to the S/R spirit). Anyway, just stuffing negative numbers into sqrt() doesn't look good. -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help",...

...d 4 hours to uncompress and extract a 10MB tar file (using 4 2.9GHz cores). I need access to the shared file system at all times to use as my /home directory from the hypervisor host, so I guess this rules out iSCSI . I came accross documentation on 'sanlock', but its purpose seems to be antithetical to what I require, as described at: http://libvirt.org/locking.html : " how to ensure a single disk cannot be used by more than one running VM at a time, across any host in a network" - but I want to ensure SAFE concurrent access by multiple VMs or any kernel , either on the hyperviso...

...e package. My current base image provides an updated debian and python3 image. Dave Lange Kenmore, WA On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:18 PM Sean Southard <sean.m.southard at gmail.com> wrote: > Dave is there a specific reason you want to install both in one container? > > It is somewhat antithetical to the purpose of docker if you don't have a > direct need. > > Also, it sounds like you are making your own python base image when you > probably want to use a lightweight python image instead and just add layers > to the image. > > But I totally get it if your intent...

...ikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> 於 2020年1月6日 週一 下午2:23寫道： > If this is something that can vary per file in a compilation and resolve correctly when one object file is built with one ABI and another object file is built with a different ABI (that seems to be antithetical to the concept of "ABI" Though) - then it should be a subtarget feature. > > ABI is generally something that has to be agreed upon across object files - so it wouldn't make sense to link two object files with two different ABIs. What's going on here that makes that vali...

...he virtual interface/OptPassGate? I'm >     guessing maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these >     APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. >      > >      >     2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty >     antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be >     bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be more >     suitable for that grouping (the scope for the bisection) to be API >     driven - passing the bisector into the LLVMContext ctor to define t...

...PassGate? I'm > > guessing maybe that worked around the circular referencing in these > > APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant here. > > > > > > 2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That seems pretty > > antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would a user be > > bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, maybe it'd be > more > > suitable for that grouping (the scope for the bisection) to be API > > driven - passing the bisector into the LLVMCont...

...ulia[1]) which uses RAII to manage resources and tries to > interface with R. It doesn't seem a productive way forward for R to > say it can't interface with these languages without first doing > expensive copies into an intermediate heap. > > The advice to avoid C++ is also antithetical to John Chambers vision > of first S and R as a interface language (from Extending R [2]) > >> The *interface* principle has always been central to R and to S > before. An interface to subroutines was _the_ way to extend the first > version of S. Subroutine interfaces have co...

...circular > referencing in these >  >     APIs? hmm, no, I suppose that wouldn't work/be relevant > here. >  >      > >  >      >     2) Why is OptBisector a ManagedStatic? That > seems pretty >  >     antithetical to the role of LLVMContext. When/why would > a user be >  >     bisecting over multiple LLVMContexts? & even then, > maybe it'd be more >  >     suitable for that grouping (the scope for the > bisection) to be API >...