search for: antipathy

...based searches. Didn't work. I expected to search CONTENTS of > emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > attachment-based searching to my users. > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the > following functionality: > > 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields > (from/subject) that returns correct results? > &...

...;t work. I expected to search CONTENTS of > > emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the > > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > > attachment-based searching to my users. > > > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a > > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the > > following functionality: > > > > 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields > > (from/subject) that returns...

...and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to > > > > index even the > > > > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > > > > attachment-based searching to my users. > > > > > > > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has > > > > ANYONE gotten a > > > > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a > > > > BASELINE, all of the > > > > following functionality: > > > > > > > > 1) The ability to search for a...

The real main differecne seems coming from "diffconfig.xml" When I put yours, Solr delete (!) schema.xml and create a "manage-schema" and starts complaining about useless types (tdates, booleans, etc..) that are not needed for Mail fileds When I put mine (from standard distribution of Arch), it keeps things as they are (yeah !), does not complains about those useless types

...m. Ensure that the matrix is NA-filled first and then use matplot to do the graph. So (a) is there an alternative and (b) is there a single assignment that will copy the Size vector into a matrix of some sort? The only way I can see to do the latter is equally messy! Sorry to bother - I have an antipathy to ugly coding where something elegant will do! Perhaps a coding therapist is in order? \John -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or &q...

...e able to do date-ranging based searches. Didn't work. I expected to search CONTENTS of emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed attachment-based searching to my users. So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the following functionality: 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields (from/subject) that returns correct results? 2) The ability to search for an...

Hello, In S-Plus Windows you can transform graphics to Powerpoint very easily, in R Windows you can use enhanced metafiles (.emf) and Powerpoint almost as easy. Is there a simular way with R in Linux to transform to the presentation program in StarOffice or OpenOffice or are you stuck with the pdf device? Fredrik Lundgren

...based searches. Didn't work. I expected to search CONTENTS of > emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > attachment-based searching to my users. > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the > following functionality: > > 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields > (from/subject) that returns correct results? > &...

I have a graph with edge and vertex weights, stored in two data frames: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- vertices <- data.frame(vertex=c("a","b","c","d"),weight=c(1,2,1,3)) edges <-

...based searches. Didn't work. I expected to search CONTENTS of > emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > attachment-based searching to my users. > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the > following functionality: > > 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields > (from/subject) that returns correct results? > &...

Yes, but it won't work in the future because the VC++ build will use Intel syntax, not AT&T. If you have mingw installed, why not use it to build LLVM? It's a lot more functional. Mixing and matching Microsoft and GNU tool chains is not good for your sanity. Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote: >Reid, > >This patch won't work for me. I compile llvm toolset with MSVC Express

...based searches. Didn't work. I expected to search CONTENTS of > emails, and despite many days of tweaks, I couldn't get it to index even the > basics like filenames/types of attachments, so I could exposed > attachment-based searching to my users. > > So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a > Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the > following functionality: > > 1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields > (from/subject) that returns correct results? > &...

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 10/17/18 7:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: <snip> >> Benno Rice is right: Lennart Poettering gets stuff done. Because he's funded. And I strongly suspect that a lot of that funding comes from M$'s interest in Upstream. <snip> > > With all due respect, many people just stopped offering any argument > about systemd, and simply fled

Friends, Sorry to write this to a developer mailing list. I have already approached some OpenSSH/OpenBSD core members on this, including Markus Friedl, Theo de Raadt, and Niels Provos, but they have chosen not to bring the issue up on the mailing list. I am not aware of any other forum where I would reach the OpenSSH developers, so I will post this here. As you know, I have been using the SSH