search for: answher

Hi, a quick question. Im running samba, but i want to use ads for auth. I have 1 windows 2000 ( or 2003 ) available, but without extra licences ( just the default 5 users ) in my current enviroment im having about 70 users. now my question. I want to install the windows 2000 or 2003 and use only the ADS install my samba, connect it with the ads of windows. Now its al about, my

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 1458 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060727/c1c4dc5d/attachment-0001.jpe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available

...automatic proxy setup. ( when you start IE, you have proxy, ALWAYS ) ( no client settings needed ) I also run debian, and have none of these problems. search in the list for "little samba setup debian" in part 2 there is how i didt it. and no problems with cups at all. ( i can't answhere because im on holiday tomorror ) there is also a link with my tools used. Louis -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-bounces+louis=van-belle.nl@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+louis=van-belle.nl@lists.samba.org] Namens Gary Dale Verzonden: woensdag 21 september 2005 5:14 CC: samb...

Hello, ? I have a stupid question, but im bit lost, and cant find the solution with google. ? I have a samba ( debian ) 3.5.8 with ldap running fine. ? Now i added an extra server en want to login on this server also with ssh. this works but my users are not allowed to write in there own home folder. ? ? My setup. server 1: debian squeeze samba 3.5.8 + ldap user folders in

Hi all, Am posting this again with a more helpful subject line... My 5 DC production domain (4.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04) is in a bit of a state. I attempted an upgrade from 4.1.5 to 4.1.7 which appeared to work, but now we have replication errors and am unable to add any new DNS entries. I am now certain that we've fallen foul of the DomainDnsZones DeletedObjects problem that I've been reading