search for: another_fil

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "another_fil".

Did you mean: another_file
2012 Oct 16
1
[LLVMdev] Cleanest way to do llvm-driven compile with specified passes
Hi there, I have a target platform for which I'm compiling code with llvm and my own backend. My current compilation route to create an executable is to just call something like: $ clang -O3 -ccc-host-triple arcompact [-I...] file_to_compile.c another_file.c [-lm etc] Importantly, clang here is running with the target version of gcc as the driver, so that gcc (call it gcc-arcompact) takes care of calling the correct assembler, linker, etc for the backend output. Now what I want to do is select my own optimization passes specifically. As far as I c...
2008 Oct 24
0
Strange! "No such file" error on smbfs.
...1 daniel daniel 11 2008-10-24 18:24 FILE_FROM_SERVER.txt A file that i can't edit created from my workstation after mount and i can't edit later: -rwxrw-r-- 1 daniel daniel 36 2008-10-24 18:29 NEW_FILE.txt ------- And another strange thing is that i can do: echo "blah blah"> ANOTHER_FILE.txt echo "blah blah">> ANOTHER_FILE.txt echo "blah blah">> ANOTHER_FILE.txt And that's works, it appends blah blah all the times... but if i: $ nano ANOTHER_FILE.txt When i try so save the changes: (No Such file or directory) I hope someone can understad m...
2003 Jul 16
0
[Bug 619] scp permissions
...gnedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org ReportedBy: johnf.ct at netzero.net I hope this isn't FAQ but I can't find an answer for this: If a file named /a/some_file is in Unix machine 'A' and it's owned by user 'someuser', if I run 'scp -p root at A:/a/some_file another_file', I expected the permissions, timestamp, owner and group of the file to be the same as the target_file. The timestamp and permissions are correct but the owner becomes root instead of 'someuser'. I'm not sure if this is a bug but I know some older versions of ssh keep the owner and...
1999 Jan 31
2
Samba 2.0 User Authentication
...te permissions for the group. Of course this works fine locally. The User connects from NT Workstation, his password is checked against the PDC in the network. Example: ----rwx--- 1 root developer 575 Jan 30 16:38 file.html ----rwx--- 1 root controller 575 Jan 30 16:38 another_file.html So everyone in the group developer or controller respectively should be able to write the file. Howerver every user belongs to the primary group 'users' and but the secondary group 'developers'. The problem is, that a user from the developer group can read the file but not wr...