search for: anonyous

Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "anonyous".

Did you mean: anonymous
2007 Jul 03
1
Share and Remote mounting ZFS for anonyous ftp
Experts, Sorry if this is a FAQ but I''m not on this alias. Please reply directly to me. I''m working on a project setting up a web portal that will use 2 hosts for load balancing ftp''s. I wanted to use ZFS to showcase it to our customer. What I''ve been trying to setup is anonymous ftp to a host that is sharing a ZFS file system. Anonymous ftp is configured and
2006 May 30
2
[LLVMdev] Adding an object to llc
...ook me some time since i was looking for an linking failure... but as errors go i should have looked at the error message a little closer. So for all those trying to add an analysis path: * add the object name to the USEDLIBS variable in the tools/llc/Makefile * use the llvm namespace instead of anonyous This mail is intended as references for people using the search engines, prior to asking questions :-). But maybe this information could also be added to http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html? Thanks ST
2006 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] Adding an object to llc
...ly, the same as declaring everything in it static. That is, the symbols are not exported and not available for linking. > > So for all those trying to add an analysis path: > * add the object name to the USEDLIBS variable in the tools/llc/Makefile > * use the llvm namespace instead of anonyous These statements are only true if you're adding an analysis pass to LLVM. If the pass is for use outside of LLVM then you want to: * use the SHARED_LIBRARY=1 flag in your makefile * use the --load option on llc to load your shared library * use any namespace other than llvm or anonymous for d...
2006 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Adding an object to llc
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Silken Tiger wrote: > I have just written an pass which does some simple ASAP scheduling. First i > registered it as optimization pass because it so nice documented and speeds > up the compilation and testing times dramaticly :-). Ok, so this is an LLVM->LLVM pass? > Then i just registered this part as an analysis part which should be used in a > modified
2006 May 23
4
[LLVMdev] Adding an object to llc
Hi I have just written an pass which does some simple ASAP scheduling. First i registered it as optimization pass because it so nice documented and speeds up the compilation and testing times dramaticly :-). Then i just registered this part as an analysis part which should be used in a modified cbackend. All seems to work fine, exept that llc fails to link. I tried removing the
2006 May 30
3
[LLVMdev] Adding an object to llc (analysis pass)
...; linking. Yes, it was pretty clear after finding out that this isn't a linking error which i suspected... > > So for all those trying to add an analysis path: > > * add the object name to the USEDLIBS variable in the tools/llc/Makefile > > * use the llvm namespace instead of anonyous > > These statements are only true if you're adding an analysis pass to > LLVM. If the pass is for use outside of LLVM then you want to: <snip> Yes, but this is already documented on the Website and works really well :-). > > This mail is intended as references for people...
2013 May 31
2
Help me understand these log messages
OK, I need a bit of help here. I'm configuring a new Asterisk 11 system and I accidentally let my firewall rules drop for a day or so. When I logged in today, I found messages like the ones below on my asterisk console. Obviously somebody was trying to take advantage of my carelessness. So can someone explain what would cause these types of messages to show up on my console? I understand
2009 Aug 07
7
Comments for Daniel Berger blog post
Hey Daniel, I''m trying to leave you a comment on this article you wrote: http://djberg96.livejournal.com/168403.html But since you disabled OpenID and anonyous, I''m not fond to register for another account just to reply your comments. Quoting your post: "" Unfortunately, I''ve slammed into the cold hard fact that FFI just isn''t the grand solution we all hoped it would be. The first problem is that libffi, the underlyi...