search for: anonymising

Hi everyone, In relation to the RODBC odbcClose bug which was fixed back in the changelog below: Version: 1.2-3 (2008-01-24, released) * Plug a memory leak in inRODBCClose (closing a connection), reported by Stephan Henne. * Use translateChar() on character data sent in. Background: I am running some data from a SQL Server database, through unixODBC (freetds) into R via the RODBC

Hi, I'm trying to use dovecot as a proxy as described on http://wiki.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/ExtraFields/Proxy but without much success. The problem is that when I send a IMAP login command dovecot is responding with "BYE Internal login failure. Refer to server log for more information." Can anyone help me shed light on this problem? Here's the log (Username,

...gid for a specific user. IMO I don't think this setup can cause such a cylic problem (exactly every week..), but I'm probably wrong. > (as an > aside, I do hope that workgroup DOMAIN_A != realm DOMAIN_A). >> For sure, in production they are different (this is the result of anonymising config) > You should > also probably be using the winbind 'rid' backend for DOMAIN_B >> We actually use nss. what advantage offers using rid backend instead of nss ? > and ALL > ranges should not overlap. >> A mistake in copy/paste configuration, it's not th...

Hi, We're using Asterisk 13.17.0 with PJSIP 2.8 bundled. I've found an issue when Asterisk tries to make a SIP call out using auth, but has the wrong credentials and keeps getting returned a SIP 407, in this example to an OpenSIPs server requiring user auth. Basically this happens: 1. Asterisk sends plain INVITE to OpenSIPs 2. OpenSIPs responds with SIP 407 auth required with a

...99999 > > I would also have expected to see this line: > > winbind refresh tickets = Yes > >>> (as an >>> aside, I do hope that workgroup DOMAIN_A != realm DOMAIN_A). >> >> For sure, in production they are different (this is the result of >> anonymising config) >>> You should >>> also probably be using the winbind 'rid' backend for DOMAIN_B >> >> We actually use nss. what advantage offers using rid backend >> >> instead >> of nss ? >>> and ALL >>> ranges should not ov...

HI James, Thanks for your reply and hints on what can be done for the Aarch64 backend optimization for llvm We have SPEC license and v8 hardware. So I will start looking into it warm regards Manjunath On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:42 PM, James Molloy <james.molloy at arm.com> wrote: > Hi Manjunath, > > At the time of writing that status we had only done our initial analysis. >

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3664 Bug ID: 3664 Summary: sftp Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: scp Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org Reporter: rossmck at

I am trying to mount a samba server using mount -t cifs -o username=x,password=x //foo.com/username /home/lesshaste/work and I get Send error in SETFSUnixInfo = -5 CIFS VFS: Negotiating Unix capabilities with the server failed. Consider mounting with the Unix Extensions disabled, if problems are found, by specifying the nounix mount option. If I then mount with nounix I don't seem to be

Hi, What if some fail2ban magic could keep OpenSIPs response from hitting Asterisk after N attempts ? Le mer. 28 oct. 2020 à 18:32, Kingsley Tart - Barritel Ltd < kingsley.tart at barritel.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > We're using Asterisk 13.17.0 with PJSIP 2.8 bundled. > > I've found an issue when Asterisk tries to make a SIP call out using > auth, but has the wrong

Hi Sanjay, The behaviour I’m talking about I’ve actually pinned down to CodeGenPrepare not working too well with ISA’s that don’t have a good scaled load. I have a patch to fix it that is going through performance testing now. Your testcase seems specific to x86 – for aarch64 we get the rather spiffy: _Z3fooPii: // @_Z3fooPii // BB#0:

We're in a bit of a panic here as we're getting a lot of errors along the lines of: May 2 12:39:00 lenny dovecot: IMAP(XXXXX): file mbox-sync-rewrite.c: line 106 (mbox_sync_headers_add_space): assertion failed: (start_pos < data_size) We didn't see this until our mail servers went under a full load and now we've trashed the ability of nearly all our users to read email.

...DOMAIN_B : range = 10000000-19999999 I would also have expected to see this line: winbind refresh tickets = Yes > > > (as an > > aside, I do hope that workgroup DOMAIN_A != realm DOMAIN_A). > >> For sure, in production they are different (this is the result of > anonymising config) > > You should > > also probably be using the winbind 'rid' backend for DOMAIN_B > >> We actually use nss. what advantage offers using rid backend > >> instead > of nss ? > > and ALL > > ranges should not overlap. > >> A mi...

Hi, THIS IS IN DUBAI. I am having PRI line with 100 DID's (00-99) and when we call to any landline or mobile number then it shows us our board number or pilot number (i.e 4663000 means 00).. As i give all the extensions a particular DID, so people from outside world can call them. The problem is the CALLERID ... When we call from any of other extension PSTN line carries out our pilot number

Ok, so my situation : Connecting to internal machines via a bastion server in AWS. Because I'm raising and tearing down the infrastructure a lot at this stage with Terraform, the IP addresses change. For the management subnet, I have a private DNS zone defined, and a public zone with a record for the bastion server. What I wanted ; to just be able to define a config entry thus : ---

I'll take a risk following Uwe's wonderful response to that advert. I'm looking for someone, perhaps particularly a stats student, who might want to do a piece of work with me on using R to present and analyse routine data that psychotherapists might submit on a cgi-bin interface and perhaps cross-referencing that against some largish referential data to which I have access.

Eric Christopher <echristo <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > The big pain issues I see merging from ARM64 to AArch64 are: > > 1. Apple have created a fairly complete scheduling model already for > > ARM64, and we'd have to merge the partial? model in AArch64 and theirs. We > > risk regressing performance on Apple's targets here, and we can't

I've tried this on both Solaris 8 and SuSE Enterprise 9 (64-bit). I get a assert-crash when using a gzipped mbox folder . OK Logged in. . SELECT test.gz * FLAGS (\Answered \Flagged \Deleted \Seen \Draft $Label4 $Label2 $Label1 $Label3 $Label5) * OK [PERMANENTFLAGS ()] Read-only mailbox. * 167 EXISTS * 0 RECENT * OK [UNSEEN 2] First unseen. * OK [UIDVALIDITY 1096038620] UIDs valid * OK

Hello everybody! Still struggeling with my latest Samba setup, I've just run accross another problem which I can't figure out on my own. Samba is supposed to act as a WINS server (among other things) on a multihomed machine. (The Samba version is 3.5.1 as part of Debian Squeeze) Here's the [global] part of the samba setup: ----------------------------------- 8<

Alex, Thank you so much for your response. I've been so consumed with other business that I only just now getting back to this issue. We have implemented your suggestion which is perfect. Thank you again. I've never asked a question of the community before and I'm extremely happy with the rapid response I received. Somewhat related to this initial problem I have an additional

> *phew*! At least it's not a regression by the patches for bug 12005. Hi Ralph, Looking back through the changelogs suggests to me that it's been around a long time.... I did however find it odd that even after disabling the 3rd host, stopping ctdb everywhere and removing *all* the db files (including persistent) I still could reproduce on 4.4.5. > > Can you try to reproduce