Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "anonth".
Did you mean:
ananth
2004 Nov 12
1
libldap is needed for LDAP support
...this problem, with both 3.0.7 and 3.0.8. The command
I am running is :
./configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --sysconfdir=/etc/sfw --with-smbwrapper
--with-acl-support --w
ith-ldap --with-ldapsam --with-ads --with-krb5=/usr/lib/krb5
I get this with the Sun ldap libraries (which I asummme are OpenLDAP by
anonther name) in /usr/lib, and also with the OpenLDAP libraries in
/usr/local/lib. In both cases libldap is there.
I noticed a similar query in early October, but could not find a response.
Any help gratefully received.
Regards
David Evans-Roberts
daveer@hrwallingford.co.uk
Systems Administrator
HR W...
2014 Apr 07
1
{CentOS} HDD Problem....
...on my CentOS machine...and
connectiing this drive externally...i got positive reports from both the
short and long tests...so the drive can obviously be "seen"....but when I
look for it in the /dev/ directory...it doesn't show up.....I'm about to
give the fdisk command line tools anonther shot....it allows me to format
the drive...and to give it a file system...(ext4)....but it doesn't
automaticcaly mount, nor can I format the drive using the Disk Utility in
CEntOS.....I'm going to give D.B.A.N one more try since I was able to
format it from the smartctl command line....ho...
2008 Oct 21
3
Samba 3.2, Samba 3.3 release planning
Hi,
i visited wiki.samba.org and read the "Release Planning for Samba 3.2"
information and the "Release Planning for Samba 3.3" information.
So my question is:
Is samba 3.2 development stopped and all concentration given to Samba
3.3 ? Because there isnt any further release note available for 3.2, but
instead there are some notes for 3.3 ?
Bye and thanks for your
2004 Sep 24
3
Arrggg Samba is not behaving
Dear all,
A while ago I posted a message regading the way Samba is behaving
and some problems that I was facing with Windows "loosing"
the connection with the server...
Here is another sample of what my /var/log/messages still looks like:
Sep 19 15:08:01 Srv smbd-classic[3499]: [2004/09/19 15:08:01, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_data(436)
Sep 19 15:08:01 Srv smbd-classic[3499]: