search for: anongid

...following data structure: /data /data/archive /data/pictures /data/music Each is a separate ext3 filesystem mounted with rw,acl. /etc/exports presents all of these filesystems properly: # exportfs -v /data/pictures 172.17.17.0/27 (rw,wdelay,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) /data/archive 172.17.17.0/27 (rw,wdelay,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) /data/music 172.17.17.0/27 (rw,wdelay,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) /data 172.17.17.0/27 (rw,wdelay,insecure,root_squash,no_subtree_...

...c9f63 (I aslo tried bigger rsize and wsize) exportfs -v: /volume1 192.168.0.13(rw,wdelay,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check) cat /var/lib/nfs/etab: /volume1 192.168.0.13(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,nocrossmnt,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,acl,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) cat /var/lib/nfs/xtab: /volume1 molungus(rw,sync,wdelay,hide,nocrossmnt,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash,no_subtree_check,secure_locks,acl,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) I already deleted everything and started a new backup but this also failed after the first day. I hope you ca...

Hi. I'm having trouble accessing a shared directory over NFSv4 on a CentOS 4.5 machine. My export file reads /test 10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0(ro,async,insecure,nohide,no_subtree_check) Running the mount command with NFSv4 as the filesystem gives me a permission denied error. [root at pebble-anoop ~]# mount -v -t nfs4 pebble-anoop:/test/ /mnt/ mount: pinging: prog 100003 vers 4 prot tcp port

...ia switched network for testing. So on the Storage server I created a user and a group called vstorage (uid:1000,gid:500) Then created a folder /pool owned by this user, permission 777 And exported it via nfs in /etc/exports: /pool 123.123.123.3(rw,async,no_subtree_check,all_squash,anonuid=1000,anongid=500) On the vHost I defined the pool via XML: <pool type='netfs'> <name>pool</name> <source> <host name='123.123.123.2'/> <dir path='pool'/> <format type='nfs'/> </source> <target> <pa...

...onymous uid/gid. Note that this does not apply to any other uids or gids that might be equally sensitive, such as user bin or group staff. Option: server.anonuid Default Value: 65534 Description: value of the uid used for the anonymous user/nfsnobody when root-squash is enabled. Option: server.anongid Default Value: 65534 Description: value of the gid used for the anonymous user/nfsnobody when root-squash is enabled. Thanks, Soumya > > --- > > An simple hack that I found is to add custom uid/gid fields in clients' > ssl certificates. The bricks use the client's uid/...

Hi All, I would like to use glusterfs in an environment where storage servers are managed by an IT service - myself :) - and several users in the organization can mount the distributed fs. The users are root on their machines. As far as I know about glusterfs, a root client user may impersonate any uid/gid since it provides its uid/gid itself when it talks to the bricks (like nfsv3). The thing

...r-x 2 root root 4096 2009-06-24 16:04 vv_25 The setting of NFS exports is following: [root at nfs_server ~]# cat /etc/exports /export/escience client(rw,sync,no_root_squash) [root at nfs_server ~]# exportfs -v /export/escience client(rw,wdelay,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,anonuid=65534,anongid=65534) Server is running latest CentOS 5.3 [root at nfs_server ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.3 (Final) [root at nfs_server ~]# uname -a Linux nfs_server 2.6.18-128.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jun 17 06:38:05 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux No denials from selinux, client's IP...

Hello Folks, i'have a problem share a directory to both unix(nfs) and windows(samba). The main problem is, that the rights are associated to winbind groups. the user in question can access the files from windows correctly and locally correctly (via su -$USER). If i mount the directory via nfs and make a su - $USER i can't write to the directory. when calling getfacl $DIR i can see, that

Hi there everyone! I'm using Samba 2.0.5a-19990721 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel 2.2.12. My system generally works fine, however recently I've had some complaints about some files being corrupted. The latest and best-handled to enable a debugging happened at around the same time. Both clients were using Windows95 OSR2 machines with Excel 97 SP-2. Two users reported the problem

...? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.allow-insecure ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.root-squash ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.anonuid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?65534 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.anongid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?65534 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.statedump-path ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /var/run/gluster ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.outstanding-rpc-limit ? ? ? ? ? ?64 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? >> server.ssl ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(nul...

...? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.allow-insecure ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? on ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.root-squash ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?off ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.anonuid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?65534 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.anongid ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?65534 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.statedump-path ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /var/run/gluster ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.outstanding-rpc-limit ? ? ? ? ? ?64 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? > server.ssl ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(null) ? ? ? ? ?...

Hi David, On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node? It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards

Hi, On 03/19/2018 03:42 PM, TomK wrote: > On 3/19/2018 5:42 AM, Ondrej Valousek wrote: > Removing NFS or NFS Ganesha from the equation, not very impressed on my > own setup either.? For the writes it's doing, that's alot of CPU usage > in top. Seems bottle-necked via a single execution core somewhere trying > to facilitate read / writes to the other bricks. > >

...30.201.31,10.30.201.32,10.30.201.39,10.30.201.43,10.30.201.44 auth.reject (null) transport.keepalive (null) server.allow-insecure (null) server.root-squash off server.anonuid 65534 server.anongid 65534 server.statedump-path /var/run/gluster server.outstanding-rpc-limit 64 features.lock-heal off features.grace-timeout 10 server.ssl (null) auth.ssl-allow...

...(null) server.allow-insecure (null) server.root-squash off server.anonuid 65534 server.anongid 65534 server.statedump-path /var/run/gluster server.outstanding-rpc-limit 512 features.lock-heal off...