Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "anon2".
Did you mean:
anon
2011 Dec 06
3
[LLVMdev] Regarding anonymous types
...on for "anonymous types", I had below observation.
For the example with anonymous types, given below
struct test
{
struct {
union {
Char a[4];
};
};
struct {
int b;
char c;
};
};
LLVM 2.6 defines the types as
%struct.anon1 = type { %union.anon0}
%struct.anon2 = type { i32, i8}
%struct.test = type { %struct.anon1, %struct.anon2}
%union.anon0 = type {[4 x i8]}
Whereas, LLVM 2.9 defines the types as
%0 = type { i32, i8}
%anonanonct. = type {%anonanonn.}
%anonanonn. = type { [ 4x i8] }
%struct.test = type { %anonanonct., %0}
In case of LLVM2.9, "%...
2011 Dec 06
0
[LLVMdev] Regarding anonymous types
...with anonymous types, given below
> struct test
> {
> struct {
> union {
> Char a[4];
> };
> };
> struct {
> int b;
> char c;
> };
> };
>
> LLVM 2.6 defines the types as
> %struct.anon1 = type { %union.anon0}
> %struct.anon2 = type { i32, i8}
> %struct.test = type { %struct.anon1, %struct.anon2}
> %union.anon0 = type {[4 x i8]}
>
> Whereas, LLVM 2.9 defines the types as
> %0 = type { i32, i8}
> %anonanonct. = type {%anonanonn.}
> %anonanonn. = type { [ 4x i8] }
> %struct.test = type { %anonan...
2003 Jul 31
2
mysql323 + gcc on 4.8-s
...Throw_2 execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - bytecode->native test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O execution - source compiled test
FAIL: Throw_2 execution - gij test
FAIL: Throw_2 -O execution - bytecode->native test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: anon2 execution - gij test
WARNING: program timed out.
should i be concerned? :) furthermore, should this be required for
mysql323 under -stable?
thanks,
-mrh
--
From: "Spam Catcher" <spam-catcher@adept.org>
To: spam-catcher@adept.org
Do NOT send email to the address listed above or...
2005 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM for a dynamically typed language
On Thu, 2005-21-04 at 10:28 -0400, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote:
> The problem is that I do not know the type of a target function at
> compile time. If you consider my code example, I don't know the type
> of 'i' until runtime (in fact, I can't even know a possible range of
> types 'i' may assume).
I don't think I properly understand what the issue is here.
2005 Apr 21
5
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM for a dynamically typed language
Evan,
The problem is that I do not know the type of a target function at
compile time. If you consider my code example, I don't know the type
of 'i' until runtime (in fact, I can't even know a possible range of
types 'i' may assume).
Thanks,
- Slava.
On 4/21/05, Evan Jones <ejones at uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-21-04 at 09:31 -0400, Vyacheslav Akhmechet