search for: annotationremark

...the things I mention here don't need to be part of the first patch (set), just something to keep in mind. Sounds good. For now, I split up the original WIP patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89240>) into two separate ones: 1. Add !annotation metadata and AnnotationRemarks generation https://reviews.llvm.org/D91188 2. __attribute__((annotate(“”) to !annotate metadata conversion https://reviews.llvm.org/D91195 Cheers, Florian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201...

> On Nov 6, 2020, at 17:32, Johannes Doerfert <johannesdoerfert at gmail.com> wrote: > > Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation below. > Once this is available we will certainly employ it to understand OpenMP programs better. That sounds like a great use case! Having multiple different uses cases during the bring-up would be very helpful to