search for: annoated

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "annoated".

Did you mean: annotated
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...robust even in the case of version mismatches between consumers and producers. That is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. ** Instruction Annotations Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. Annotated assembly goes through the normal instructi...
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...e case of version mismatches between consumers and producers. That is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. > > ** Instruction Annotations > > Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. > > Annotated assembly goes through the normal...
2015 Mar 24
8
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
On 03/10/2015 10:14 AM, Diego Novillo wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com > <mailto:bob.wilson at apple.com>> wrote: > > >> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com >> <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM,
2006 Feb 25
3
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
Hi Reid, Reid Spencer schrieb: > I have some thoughts on this too .. > Great! > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > >>I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information >>is done by some runtime std::map<Value*,foo> stuff. Which is really >>handy at runtime, but I *had* serialization in mind when I was thinking
2012 Oct 12
2
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...mismatches between consumers and producers. That is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. >> >> ** Instruction Annotations >> >> Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. >> >> Annotated assembly goes through th...
2012 Oct 12
3
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...producers. That is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. >>>> >>>> ** Instruction Annotations >>>> >>>> Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. >>>> >>>> Annotated assembly...
2012 Oct 12
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...ween consumers and producers. That is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. >>> >>> ** Instruction Annotations >>> >>> Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. >>> >>> Annotated assembly goes thr...
2006 Feb 25
0
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
This is a interesting thread. I think this would also help with compiling scripting languages such as JavaScript/Python etc. We could keep the high level meta data and runtime binding info as language specific bytecode in the file and just have the parts that are easy to represent as compileable in the main object sections. There is no intrinsic reason for all the runtime type information to get
2016 Apr 27
3
Crash: setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL)
Hi, Using 2.2.9 (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and sending the following command, the server crashes when I try to delete an annotation: ? login ? C: 2 setannotation Trash "/vendor/cmu/cyrus-imapd/expire" ("value.shared" NIL) Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1 dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<heiko>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=6651, secured Apr 27 09:29:16 backend1
2012 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...at is, the syntax generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. >>>>> >>>>> ** Instruction Annotations >>>>> >>>>> Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. >>>>> >>>>> Annotated a...
2015 Mar 24
3
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
> On Mar 24, 2015, at 10:27 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > > Diego and I have discussed this according to the feedback received. We > have revised plan for this (see Diego's last reply). Here is a more > detailed re-cap: > > 1) keep MD_prof definition as it is today; also keep using the > frequency propagation as it is (assuming programs
2006 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
Hi Jakob, I have some thoughts on this too .. On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 19:56 +0100, Jakob Praher wrote: > I get you 100 % here. But as you say later in the mail, many information > is done by some runtime std::map<Value*,foo> stuff. Which is really > handy at runtime, but I *had* serialization in mind when I was thinking > about Annotations. I see annotations as a way to serialize
2012 Oct 14
1
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Annotated assembly output
...x generally does not carry semantics beyond "this text has an annotation," so consumers can simply ignore annotations they do not understand or do not care about. >>>>>> >>>>>> ** Instruction Annotations >>>>>> >>>>>> Annoated assembly display will supply contextual markup to help clients more efficiently implement things like pretty printers. Most markup will be target independent, so clients can effectively provide good display without any target specific knowledge. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ann...
2006 Feb 26
1
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
Hi Mike, hope you are doing well with the llvm gcjx backend. I am currently writing an llvm backend for a C like language for tracing (like D in dtrace). I am very interested in this area. Do you currently put your work in a repository? (maybe as Tom suggested gcjx.sf.net would be an easy start - since it would not require gcc committer status). I am keen on getting LLVM support for gcj. Maybe we
2006 Feb 24
5
[LLVMdev] Re: gcc like attributes and annotations
hi Chris! thanks for your reply. First of all I did not know about the history with the Annotation stuff. Annotable for me was a way how one could realize this things. So as I see it right now - it is more that Annotable will completly vanish soon. This is interesting to me. Chris Lattner schrieb: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, Jakob Praher wrote: > >> When translating a complex c
2015 Mar 05
5
[LLVMdev] RFC - Improvements to PGO profile support
> On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:19 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 6:54 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google.com <mailto:dnovillo at google.com>> wrote: > > I've created a few bugzilla issues with details of some of the things I'll be looking into. I'm not yet done wordsmithing the overall design document.