search for: androideabi

...has encountered this issue when cross compiling cuda on Nvidia TX2 running android. The error is In file included from <built-in>:1: In file included from prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/clang-4667116/lib64/clang/7.0.1/include/__clang_cuda_runtime_wrapper.h:219: ../cuda/targets/aarch64-linux-androideabi/include/math_functions.hpp:3477:19: error: no matching function for call to '__isinf' if (a == 0.0 || __isinf(a)) { ^~~~~~~ ../cuda/targets/aarch64-linux-androideabi/include/math_functions_dbl_ptx3.hpp:165:38: note: candidate function not viable: call to __device__ funct...

...ross compiling > cuda on Nvidia TX2 running android. > > The error is > In file included from <built-in>:1: > In file included from > prebuilts/clang/host/linux-x86/clang-4667116/lib64/clang/7.0.1/include/__clang_cuda_runtime_wrapper.h:219: > ../cuda/targets/aarch64-linux-androideabi/include/math_functions.hpp:3477:19: > error: no matching function for call to '__isinf' > if (a == 0.0 || __isinf(a)) { > ^~~~~~~ > ../cuda/targets/aarch64-linux-androideabi/include/math_functions_dbl_ptx3.hpp:165:38: > note: candidate function not viable:...

Hi, I am new to LLVM I want to use llvm and clang on Android, I have downloaded android toolchain and did the configure for llvm using the following commad ./configure --build=arm-linux-androideabi --host=arm-linux-androideabi --target=arm-linux-androideabi --with-float=hard --with-fpu=neon --enable-targets=arm --enable-optimized --enable-assertions and was getting the error "checking build system type... Invalid configuration `arm-linux-androideabi': system `androideabi' not r...

...[exec] StaticLibrary : lib1.a [exec] StaticLibrary : lib0.a [exec] StaticLibrary : lib1.a [exec] SharedLibrary : libdmt_opus.so [exec] SharedLibrary : libdmt_opus.so [exec] SharedLibrary : libdmt_opus.so [exec] C:/android/android-ndk-r8e/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/preb uilt/windows/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-androideabi/4.6/../../../../arm-linux-andr oideabi/bin/ld.exe: ./obj/local/armeabi/lib0.a(analysis.o): in function run_anal ysis:jni/src/libopus/src/analysis.c:636: error: undefined reference to 'optimize _framesize' [exec] C:/android/andr...

...re may also be a way of handling an inappropriate cpu/triple combination more gracefully. The full story of a problem with the Arm target is available at https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36542 . A short description of the problem is: - Source files are compiled with -mthumb --target=arm-linux-androideabi -mcpu=cortex-a7, this records a triple of thumbv7a-linux-androideabi in the bitcode file. - The command line for the link step only passes --target= arm-linux-androideabi. - The default cpu passed to LTO for a triple arm-linux-androideabi is the very old arm7tdmi. - When the ARMAsmBackend is create...

...n inappropriate > cpu/triple combination more gracefully. > > The full story of a problem with the Arm target is available at > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36542 . A short description of > the problem is: > - Source files are compiled with -mthumb > --target=arm-linux-androideabi -mcpu=cortex-a7, > this records a triple of thumbv7a-linux-androideabi in the bitcode file. > - The command line for the link step only passes --target= > arm-linux-androideabi. > - The default cpu passed to LTO for a triple arm-linux-androideabi is > the very old arm7tdmi. > - Wh...

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 February 2014 13:47, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: >> Hm, I see that -funwind-tables on arm-linux-androideabi target >> replaces this "cantunwind" with a proper unwind table. >> Hence http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2762. > > If Android is using EHABI (I think it is), the default now is to > output full tables all the time, everywhere. This will change to be > the same...

...tables. I'm going to add that in the >> driver for all sanitizers then. > > -funwind-tables are not yet understood by ARM, but it is for Dwarf EH. > I plan on moving ARM to the same style as Dwarf, so you can assume it > is correct. Hm, I see that -funwind-tables on arm-linux-androideabi target replaces this "cantunwind" with a proper unwind table. Hence http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2762.

> On Aug 7, 2014, at 4:12 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > >> I downloaded the latest NDK (r10) and compiled with the following cmd: >> arm-linux-androideabi-clang myMemcpy.c -S -fno-builtin -o0 >> It still produces assembly with a call to "memcpy". Maybe the -fno-builtin >> is broken also in the latest release. > It's not broken. Even freestanding implementation is supposed to > provide mem* functions. > It’s also s...

Hi Venkata, > ./configure --build=arm-linux-androideabi --host=arm-linux-androideabi > --target=arm-linux-androideabi --with-float=hard --with-fpu=neon > --enable-targets=arm --enable-optimized --enable-assertions Renato's suggestion is a good one, but I suspect the immediate problem here is that this configure line is for building *on* an AR...

...CMake configuration below). The only missing pieces are that the shared object is not added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is this a build configuration you'd consider using? $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ -DANDROID=1 \ -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDir)/platforms/android-19/arch-arm \ -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDir)/platforms/android-19/arc...

...individually, and fix them before commit. The > bots > > will also be happier, and every one wins. > > [ jasonk --> ] Sorry, but I don't understand what you want here. The > tests I touched are marked unsupported (i.e. won't be run at all) ONLY for > aarch64-linux-androideabi. Is there something else you want? It should not > impact any other configuration of TSAN/compiler-rt as-is. I also guard TSAN > with a CMAKE variable so that it only gets built for aarch64 iff > COMPILER_RT_FORCE_TSAN_AARCH64=1 > > > > > cheers, > > -renato > &gt...

Hi, I downloaded the latest NDK (r10) and compiled with the following cmd: *arm-linux-androideabi-clang myMemcpy.c -S -fno-builtin -o0* It still produces assembly with a call to "memcpy". Maybe the -*fno-builtin *is broken also in the latest release. Do you have some other idea that can help here? Thanks, David On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com...

On 13-07-18 8:12 AM, Dubois-Rande, Antoine wrote: > C:/android/android-ndk-r8e/toolchains/arm-linux-androideabi-4.6/prebuilt/windows/bin/../lib/gcc/arm-linux-androideabi/4.6/../../../../arm-linux-androideabi/bin/ld.exe: ./obj/local/armeabi/lib0.a(analysis.o): in function > run_analysis:jni/src/libopus/src/analysis.c:636: error: undefined reference to > 'optimize_framesize' Don't include an...

.../triple combination more gracefully. >> >> The full story of a problem with the Arm target is available at >> https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36542 . A short description of >> the problem is: >> - Source files are compiled with -mthumb >> --target=arm-linux-androideabi -mcpu=cortex-a7, >> this records a triple of thumbv7a-linux-androideabi in the bitcode file. >> - The command line for the link step only passes --target= >> arm-linux-androideabi. >> - The default cpu passed to LTO for a triple arm-linux-androideabi is >> the very old...

...example the following code: > > for (i=0;i<size;++i) > dest[i]=src[i]; > > will be compiled to (target=ARM assembly): > > bl __aeabi_memcpy(PLT) > > The compile cmd: > > /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolchain/bin/clang31 -cc1 -triple > arm-none-linux-androideabi -S -target-abi aapcs-linux -target-cpu arm1022e > -backend-option -arm-enable-ehabi -backend-option > -arm-enable-ehabi-descriptors -backend-option -arm-ignore-has-ras > -internal-isystem > /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolchain/lib/clang/3.1/include > -internal-externc-isystem > /u...

...are that the shared object is not >> added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is >> this a build configuration you'd consider using? >> >> $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ >> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ >> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ >> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ >> -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ >> -DANDROID=1 \ >> -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ >> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDir)/platforms/android-19/arch-arm \ >> -DCMAKE_...

...cing some parts with efficient library functions. For example the following code: for (i=0;i<size;++i) dest[i]=src[i]; will be compiled to (target=ARM assembly): bl __aeabi_memcpy(PLT) The compile cmd: /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolchain/bin/clang31 -cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-androideabi -S -target-abi aapcs-linux -target-cpu arm1022e -backend-option -arm-enable-ehabi -backend-option -arm-enable-ehabi-descriptors -backend-option -arm-ignore-has-ras -internal-isystem /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolchain/lib/clang/3.1/include -internal-externc-isystem /usr/share/android-arm-l14-toolc...

Hi, I’ve run into a case where `llc -mattr=+soft-float` for "armv7-unknown-linux-androideabi” segfaults, while `llc -float-abi=soft` does not. Similarly if the "target-features"="+soft-float” metadata is embedded, llc segfaults. I fear I’m missing something rather subtle here, could someone help me understand the differences? Cheers, Moritz

...t; added to the install directory and the test suites are not built. Is >>>> this a build configuration you'd consider using? >>>> >>>> $ cmake -G Ninja .. \ >>>> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=ship \ >>>> -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-gcc \ >>>> -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=arm-linux-androideabi-g++ \ >>>> -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH=`pwd`/../../llvm/out/ship \ >>>> -DANDROID=1 \ >>>> -DCMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME=Linux \ >>>> -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS=--sysroot=$(ndkDir)/platforms/and...