search for: andrewrk

...t; <tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the > normal rodata > <tomhughes> so without it you have two > <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld > <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure > <andrewrk> the not working elf file has only 1 .rodata section > <andrewrk> here's the difference between bad and good headers: > https://clbin.com/vvB8O > <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs > <tomhughes> don't think it'...

...ting strange object files: <tomhughes> I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the normal rodata <tomhughes> so without it you have two <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure <andrewrk> the not working elf file has only 1 .rodata section <andrewrk> here's the difference between bad and good headers: https://clbin.com/vvB8O <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs <tomhughes> don't think it's the problem but t...

...I suspect that is some extra ro segment in addition to the >> normal rodata >> <tomhughes> so without it you have two >> <tomhughes> but I know nothing about lld >> <tomhughes> but without an executable to examine/test it's hard to be sure >> <andrewrk> the not working elf file has only 1 .rodata section >> <andrewrk> here's the difference between bad and good headers: >> https://clbin.com/vvB8O >> <tomhughes> ah I see it's because it's a mapped ro segment in the phdrs >> <tomhughes> don...

As a frontend, what are the downsides of enabling --no-rosegment by default? So far the pro list is: * valgrind debug info will work by default What's on the con list? On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Shoaib Meenai <smeenai at fb.com> wrote: > It's more of a valgrind issue than an LLD issue, but you can work around > it by linking with --no-rosegment > > > >

Here is LLVM IR code: https://gist.github.com/andrewrk/041af662b3ff515cd0be64ab85c112d7 That produces the following valgrind message: $ valgrind llc -filetype=obj bug.ll ==27195== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==27195== at 0x56A0917: (anonymous namespace)::LiveDebugValues::transferDebugValue(llvm::MachineInstr const&am...

Something like this should work I think. ; ModuleID = 'test.ll' source_filename = "test.ll" define void @entry(<4 x i32>* %a, <4 x i32>* %b, <4 x i32>* %x) { Entry: %tmp = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32>* %a, align 16 %tmp1 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32>* %b, align 16 %tmp2 = add <4 x i32> %tmp, %tmp1 %tmpsign = icmp slt <4 x

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > Unreferenced linkonce globals are allowed to be discarded. > > > Is __udivmodti4 referenced? > It's referenced by a different .o file, but nothing within the module. My confusion comes from the missing direct object in the sentence. Referenced by a function local to the module? Referenced by any