search for: and3

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 24 matches for "and3".

Did you mean: and
2018 Apr 09
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...add a flag while registering with the bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing >a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >for 3 netdev scenario. Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: 2netdev: bypass_master / / VF_slave 3netdev: bypass_master / \ / \ VF_slave backup_slave Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? Thanks!
2018 Apr 09
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...add a flag while registering with the bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing >a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >for 3 netdev scenario. Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: 2netdev: bypass_master / / VF_slave 3netdev: bypass_master / \ / \ VF_slave backup_slave Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? Thanks!
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...e bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing >> > a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > for 3 netdev scenario. >> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> 2netdev: >> bypass_master >> / >> / >> VF_slave >> >> 3netdev: >> bypass_master >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave backup_slave >> >> Is that correct? If not, how...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...e bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing >> > a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > for 3 netdev scenario. >> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> 2netdev: >> bypass_master >> / >> / >> VF_slave >> >> 3netdev: >> bypass_master >> / \ >> / \ >> VF_slave backup_slave >> >> Is that correct? If not, how...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...r is doing >> > > > a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > 2netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / >> > > / >> > > VF_slave >> > > >> > > 3netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / \ >> &...
2018 Apr 10
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...r is doing >> > > > a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > 2netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / >> > > / >> > > VF_slave >> > > >> > > 3netdev: >> > > bypass_master >> > > / \ >> &...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > / >> > > > > / >> > > > > VF_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > 3netdev: >>...
2018 Apr 10
3
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > / >> > > > > / >> > > > > VF_slave >> > > > > >> > > > > 3netdev: >>...
2005 Jul 17
1
routing based on user id
Hi all! I''ve got 2 (soon 3) internet connection. 1 - via ADSL, 2(and3) via ppp My network: http://desima.objectis.net/network-diag linux1: user1.user2 eth0=192.168.1.1 ppp0=192.168.5.2( gw 192.168.5.1) gw=192.168.1.2 ( thru ADSL) compA=192.168.1.6 compB=192.168.1.15 gw2=192.168.1.217 via ppp to different ISP All works for compA and CompB, user1 should use defaul...
2003 Mar 18
1
winbind on AIX
...ve the Unix uid's corresponding to windows users from Unix. It is OK that files on samba shares appear only with numeric uids from unix. Is there a mode where smbd interacts directly with winbind, avoiding going through the nss layer, which doesn't exist on AIX? I've tried both 2.2.8 and3-alpha22 with pretty similar results. I can configure and run winbindd, wbinfo works, but smbd won't authenticate NT users unless they map to existing Unix users already in the passwd file. Any guidance is appreciated, Steve Roylance P.S.- A couple minor issues w/ 3-alpha22 SWAT's http au...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...del and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > VF_slave >> > > >...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...del and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > VF_slave >> > > >...
2017 Nov 30
2
TwoAddressInstructionPass bug?
...mZ/asm-18.ll' source_filename = "/home/ijonpan/llvm/llvm-dev/test/CodeGen/SystemZ/asm-18.ll" define i32 @f23(i32 %old) { %and1 = and i32 %old, 14 %and2 = and i32 %old, 254 %res1 = call i32 asm "stepa $1, $2, $3", "=h,r,r,0"(i32 %old, i32 %and1, i32 %and2) %and3 = and i32 %res1, 127 %and4 = and i32 %res1, 128 %res2 = call i32 asm "stepb $1, $2, $3", "=r,h,h,0"(i32 %res1, i32 %and3, i32 %and4) ret i32 %res2 }
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...s check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > > > / >> > > > >...
2018 Apr 11
2
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...s check can be done in bypass module >> > > > > > > > > > for 3 netdev scenario. >> > > > > > > > > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >> > > > > > > > > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >> > > > > > > > > 2netdev: >> > > > > > > > > bypass_master >> > > > > > > > > / >> > > > > > > > > / >> > > > >...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...e to indicate if the driver is doing >>>> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >>>> for 3 netdev scenario. >>> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >>> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >>> 2netdev: >>> bypass_master >>> / >>> / >>> VF_slave >>> >>> 3netdev: >>> bypass_master >>> / \ >>> / \ >>> VF_slave backup_slave...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...oing >>>>>> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >>>>>> for 3 netdev scenario. >>>>> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >>>>> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >>>>> 2netdev: >>>>> bypass_master >>>>> / >>>>> / >>>>> VF_slave >>>>> >>>>> 3netdev: >>>>> bypass_master >>>>>...
2018 Apr 09
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...egistering with the bypass module to indicate if the driver is doing >> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >> for 3 netdev scenario. > Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be > between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: > 2netdev: > bypass_master > / > / > VF_slave > > 3netdev: > bypass_master > / \ > / \ > VF_slave backup_slave > > Is that correct? If not, how does it look like? > > Looks correct. VF_slave a...
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...;> a 2 netdev or 3 netdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >>>>>>>> for 3 netdev scenario. >>>>>>> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >>>>>>> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >>>>>>> 2netdev: >>>>>>> bypass_master >>>>>>> / >>>>>>> / >>>>>>> VF_slave >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 3netdev: >&g...
2018 Apr 11
0
[RFC PATCH net-next v5 3/4] virtio_net: Extend virtio to use VF datapath when available
...tdev model and based on that flag this check can be done in bypass module >>>>>>>>>> for 3 netdev scenario. >>>>>>>>> Just let me undestand it clearly. What I expect the difference would be >>>>>>>>> between 2netdev and3 netdev model is this: >>>>>>>>> 2netdev: >>>>>>>>> bypass_master >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>> VF_slave >>>>>>>&g...