Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "anastate".
Did you mean:
anastate1
2018 Jun 04
2
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
FWIW, I've raised the LICM issue here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37682
On 31 May 2018 at 13:28, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks,
> These are very helpful.
>
> As I understand it, SROA and LICM render some variables
> "useless" by optimizing the code to not use them. Hence we can't debug
> them.
>
>
2018 Mar 16
2
[GSoC 2018] Application - Improve Debugging of Optimized Code
Hello,
I submitted a draft proposal at the gsoc website.
You can see the application in the attached pdf.
Any feedback is welcome.
thanks,
Anastasis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GSoC2018_llvm_application.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 41454 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2018 Mar 16
0
[GSoC 2018] Application - Improve Debugging of Optimized Code
Thanks Anastasis. This proposal looks good to me, this is great work.
@all, here is a link to the project description:
https://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_optimized_debugging
Davide (CC'd) and I will be available as mentors. I'd be happy to help answer any questions/concerns about this project.
vedant
> On Mar 16, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at
2018 Sep 21
2
Opus 1.2.1 crash on silk/VAD.c:315
...:91
(gdb) frame 0
#0 0x0000000000aaf38a in silk_VAD_GetNoiseLevels (pX=pX at entry=0x7f26740297a0,
psSilk_VAD=psSilk_VAD at entry=0x15897c38) at silk/VAD.c:315
315 min_coef = silk_DIV32_16( silk_int16_MAX, silk_RSHIFT( psSilk_VAD->counter, 4 ) + 1 );
(gdb) p *psSilk_VAD
$20 = {AnaState = {0, 0}, AnaState1 = {0, 0}, AnaState2 = {0, 0}, XnrgSubfr = {0, 0, 0, 0}, NrgRatioSmth_Q8 = {
25600, 25600, 25600, 25600}, HPstate = 0, NL = {50, 25, 16, 12}, inv_NL = {42949656, 85899327, 134217709,
178956950}, NoiseLevelBias = {50, 25, 16, 12}, counter = -16}
OS: Linux debian-build...
2018 Apr 25
0
[GSoC 2018] Improve Debugging of Optimized Code
Welcome Anastasis! I'm very happy to see this work going forward.
I see that your first task is to make "debugify" into a function pass,
so we will be able to get data on a per-pass basis. At EuroLLVM there
was a relevant lightning talk about a different tool, see:
http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Lightning_11
It will be extremely interesting to see how well your results
2018 Apr 25
2
[GSoC 2018] Improve Debugging of Optimized Code
Hello,
My proposal for GSoC 2018 [attachment] about
improving debugging of optimized code was accepted.
I will work with my mentor Vedant Kumar (vsk) through the summer to
find where DI loss occurs and try to fix as many occurrences as possible.
I will also be keeping a devlog here: https://gramanas.github.io/
You can check what the first steps of my project are on the latest post:
2018 Feb 26
1
[GSoC 2018] Improving debugging of optimized code
Hello,
I'm an undergraduate student in the CS department
of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh).
Last year I successfully completed GSoC with Mixxx [1] and this year I
would like to work on LLVM.
I am interested in "Improving debugging of optimized code" [2].
I have gone through the kaleidoscope tutorial and I've set up a basic
dev environment for LLVM and clang.
2018 Aug 07
3
[RFC] Add DebugLoc parameter in Instruction’s Create() functions
Many DI-related bugs are caused by missing Debug Location
in an instruction created in a transformation. Most of the
time the fix is trivial once you found where the culprit
instruction is created (https://reviews.llvm.org/D50263).
Currently, when you create a new Instruction, in order to
give it DL you have to either use an IRBuilder that is
previously set to the correct DL or “manually” create
2018 Sep 27
1
[Re:] Re: Opus 1.2.1 crash on silk/VAD.c:315
...oiseLevels
>> (pX=pX at entry=0x7f26740297a0,
>> psSilk_VAD=psSilk_VAD at entry=0x15897c38) at silk/VAD.c:315
>> 315 min_coef = silk_DIV32_16( silk_int16_MAX, silk_RSHIFT(
>> psSilk_VAD->counter, 4 ) + 1 );
>>
>> (gdb) p *psSilk_VAD
>> $20 = {AnaState = {0, 0}, AnaState1 = {0, 0}, AnaState2 = {0, 0},
>> XnrgSubfr = {0, 0, 0, 0}, NrgRatioSmth_Q8 = {
>> 25600, 25600, 25600, 25600}, HPstate = 0, NL = {50, 25, 16, 12},
>> inv_NL = {42949656, 85899327, 134217709,
>> 178956950}, NoiseLevelBias = {50, 25, 16, 12}, counte...
2018 May 31
1
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
> That is good to hear / expected, since we went though great lengths to ensure that SROA preserves variable debug info.
>
> Have you looked at the location-less phi instructions?
> Does empty mean line 0 or do you mean they have no debug location whatsoever?
Most of them have line 0, only 12 are locationless.
> Are they empty for good reasons or does it look more like an
2018 Sep 27
0
Opus 1.2.1 crash on silk/VAD.c:315
...00000aaf38a in silk_VAD_GetNoiseLevels
> (pX=pX at entry=0x7f26740297a0,
> psSilk_VAD=psSilk_VAD at entry=0x15897c38) at silk/VAD.c:315
> 315 min_coef = silk_DIV32_16( silk_int16_MAX, silk_RSHIFT(
> psSilk_VAD->counter, 4 ) + 1 );
>
> (gdb) p *psSilk_VAD
> $20 = {AnaState = {0, 0}, AnaState1 = {0, 0}, AnaState2 = {0, 0},
> XnrgSubfr = {0, 0, 0, 0}, NrgRatioSmth_Q8 = {
> 25600, 25600, 25600, 25600}, HPstate = 0, NL = {50, 25, 16, 12},
> inv_NL = {42949656, 85899327, 134217709,
> 178956950}, NoiseLevelBias = {50, 25, 16, 12}, counter = -16}
>
&...
2018 May 30
0
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
> On May 30, 2018, at 8:37 AM, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Introduction
> ============
>
> `SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the
> pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool
> shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info
> loss.
>
> With
2018 Apr 25
1
[GSoC 2018] Improve Debugging of Optimized Code
Hi Anastasis,
Welcome, and congratulations!
It's great to see that you're maintaining a devlog and have hit the ground running. I'm looking forward to working with you.
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 12:56 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Welcome Anastasis! I'm very happy to see this work going forward.
>
> I see that your first task is to
2018 May 30
2
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
>
> is in the business of deciding, but it does score it as a difference
> because it now, at no point, sees the expression "first" evaluate to a
> value of 5, or "total" to a value of 8 which it did previously. From the
> source-level debugging experience, the variables now just get updated
> between iterations.
>
Obviously should've been 7 for that
2018 May 30
4
[SROA][DebugInfo][GSoC] Testing SROA on amalgamated sqlite source
Introduction
============
`SROA' is an early stage pass running at the very beginning of the
pipeline in `-O{1,2,3}'. Greg Bedwell's report from his DExTer tool
shows SROA on function as one of the major culprits of Debug Info
loss.
With debugify-each partially done I tried testing this on the
amalgamated sqlite source.
The steps are as follows:
,----
| # generate