search for: analyzis

Hello, I'm studying how the SCEV analyzis works and how to use it and I could not create an example where the SCEV analyzis identifies an expression as "SCEVAddRecExpr". Aren't the expressions below the kind of pattern that should be represented as a "AddRecExpr" ? SCEV: (1 + (2 * %3) or SCEV: (%1 + (2 * %3) or...

...reating new thread/loops for each SCCs. The last step is responsible to insert communication between the stages to enable data forwarding and synchronization. The main goal of this project is to implement DSWP as a pass in the LLVM opt tool, however as a "side-effect" of this project new analyzis can be added to opt such as -print-pdg to print the program dependence graph in a DOT[3] format and/or -print-ddg to print the data dependence graph in DOT format. ### Schedule of Deliverables Week 01: The first week I'll be involved in constructing the control dependence graph. Week 02: Th...

Hi mobi, Sorry, I am new to clang AST and can not get the point you mentioned. :-( What I try to do is develop a tool that can analyze data dependence at runtime. Therefore, I need to analyze trace containing memory accessing information (eg. arrays within loops). To do that, I first instrument a recording function to get addresses of load/store instructions. However, there are

...rate the .bc file and output file. I am trying to use > it to generate instruction counts, stats, basic block instruction > count and identification of natural loops in the program. > > I used command analyze -instcount hello.bc. however, the outp[ut it > generates is "printing analyzis 'counts the various types of > instructions' for function 'main' :" > > It does not give me any further details. could you help me as to how > to configure the tool to obtain the stats. I truly appreciate your > help in this reagrd. By itself, an analysis does...

...is adding very little improvement over AA, it seems. I don't have any failing test cases right now, so it may be that this patch actually fixed my problem. However, right now it is confusing to have the whole algorithm written around memory operands and at the same time allow register / offsets analyzis in the midst of things. It would be good to rewrite that part like you explained. What are your current thoughts about this? -----Original Message----- From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov] Sent: den 23 december 2014 18:11 To: Sanjin Sijaric Cc: Mattias Eriksson V; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu; T...

...ace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module 'C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\gdi32.dll' : builtin trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module 'C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\user32.dll' : builtin err:module:BUILTIN32_LoadLibraryExA loaded .so but dll setupx.dll still not found - 16-bit dll or version conflict. after some analyzis, several lines makes me more happy and brings idea about builtin "ole32.dll" being too "recent" to be upgraded: trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module 'E:\IXP001.TMP\rpcrt4.dll' : native trace:loaddll:load_dll Loaded module 'C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM\ole32.dll' : builtin...

...ment over > AA, it seems. I don't have any failing test cases right now, so it may > be that this patch actually fixed my problem. > However, right now it is confusing to have the whole algorithm written > around memory operands and at the same time allow register / offsets > analyzis in the midst of things. It would be good to rewrite that part > like you explained. What are your current thoughts about this? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov] > Sent: den 23 december 2014 18:11 > To: Sanjin Sijaric > Cc: Mattias E...