Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "analyzecallreturn".
2008 Dec 20
1
[LLVMdev] anybody working on ARM Cortex support?
On Dec 18, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Sandeep Patel wrote:
> Since there have been no answers, I will have to start at the
> beginning.
>
> One of the first changes I'd like to try is adding the additional
> registers and the AAPCS VFP variant calling conventions. Is there a
> reason why the ARM Target isn't using the CCState machinery?
Please clarify. I am not sure what you
2008 Dec 27
3
[LLVMdev] Using CallingConvLower in ARM target
...onventions. Is there a
>>> reason why the ARM Target isn't using the CCState machinery?
>>
>> Please clarify. I am not sure what you mean by CCState machinery.
>
> The ARM Target doesn't use the class CCState. For example,
> CCState.AnalyzeCallOperands, CCState.AnalyzeCallReturn,
> CCState.AnalyzeReturn, etc. There is no ARMCallingConv.td as there is
> for other targets. All calling convention decisions are made manually.
>
> If there is no reason not to, it might simplify adding the AAPCS
> Standard Variants like AAPCS-AFP, etc. since they'll be defined...