search for: analysising

Hi, Dear LLVMers I just touch llvm source code for several days, and I didn't know the interfaces of the analysises and transformations of LLVM. For exampe, how to backtrace CFG, and whether exits a backtracking interator to do such work? For a novice, I also seek for suggestions about how to become familiar with LLVM interfaces as soon as possible. Now I have a plan to write a pass based on

Hi, all I want to use the alias analysises in project poolalloc, but I encounter some problem during installing it. I install poolalloc as follow: 1) cd llvm/projects svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/branches/release_32 poolalloc 3) cd LLVM-object-directory make tools-only cd projects/poolalloc make When I carried out "make", I get the next error

Hi all: I was analysising the speex code these days and learned much from it. Thank you so much! But I have a question about VAD: After preprocess(denoise and agc are off, vad is on),the input pcm speech was distorted seriously.The input speech include ten syllables(one~ ten), but the output speech lost one! Can you tell...

dear list! i have run several glm analysises to estimate a mean rate of dung decay for independent trials. i would like to compare these results statistically but can't find any solution. the glm calls are: dung.glm1<-glm(STATE~DAYS, data=o_cov, family="binomial(link="logit")) dung.glm2<-glm(STATE~DAYS, data=o_cov_T12, family="binomial(link="logit")) as

I have a glm regression (quasi-poisson) of log(mu) on x but I have varying degrees of confidence in the x values, and can attach a numerical weighting to each. Can anyone help me with suggestions of how to analysise this. Is there an R package that would help? Wendy [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:54 +0800, lucefe wrote: > Hi, Dear LLVMers > > I just touch llvm source code for several days, and I didn't know the > interfaces of the analysises and transformations of LLVM. For exampe, > how to backtrace CFG, and whether exits a backtracking interator to do > such work? > > For a novice, I also seek for suggestions about how to become

Thank you. But now I am using LLVM 2.9, so which version of poolalloc I should use ? -------------------------------------------- Qiuping Yi Institute Of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:12 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Qiuping, > > If you use the release_32 branch of poolalloc, then you need to use LLVM > 3.2. >

Dear Qiuping, If you use the release_32 branch of poolalloc, then you need to use LLVM 3.2. For directions on compiling poolalloc with LLVM 3.2, please the SAFECode build directions at http://safecode.cs.illinois.edu/docs/Install.html. You can just skip the steps in the directions that compile SAFECode. Regards, John Criswell On 1/30/15 10:05 AM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > Hi, all > > I

I am just not upgrade my LLVM. So I must use some higer LLVM version, right? -------------------------------------------- Qiuping Yi Institute Of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:21 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/30/15 10:17 AM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > > Thank you. But now I am using LLVM 2.9, so which version of poolalloc I

On 1/30/15 10:17 AM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > Thank you. But now I am using LLVM 2.9, so which version of > poolalloc I should use ? Why are you using LLVM 2.9? That's an old version of LLVM (even by my standards). Is there some other LLVM-based tool that requires that you use LLVM 2.9? Regards, John Criswell > > > -------------------------------------------- > Qiuping Yi

Hi, John Criswell Thank you very much. I am installing LLVM-3.2, but I encounter the next error when carrying out "make": llvm[3]: Compiling ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp for Release+Asserts build ClangASTNodesEmitter.cpp: In member function ‘std::pair<llvm::Record*, llvm::Record*><unnamed>::ClangASTNodesEmitter::EmitNode(const std::multimap<llvm::Record*, llvm::Record*,

On 1/30/15 10:24 AM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > I am just not upgrade my LLVM. So I must use some higer LLVM version, > right? Yes. For working with poolalloc, I would recommend using LLVM 3.2 as we know poolalloc compiles with LLVM 3.2. If there's a release_29 branch for poolalloc, you could use that, but you won't get any bug fixes that we added between poolalloc 2.9 and poolalloc

Which compiler are you using to compile poolalloc? Looks like it doesn't support C++11 (doesn't recognize nullptr). Jingyue On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Qiuping Yi <yiqiuping at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, John Criswell > > Thank you very much. > > I am installing LLVM-3.2, but I encounter the next error when carrying out > "make": > > llvm[3]:

Hi, I am currently analysising a counting process form of a cox model allowing for the inclusion of time dependent covariates. An example model I have fitted is modlqol<-coxph(Surv(Tstart,Tstop,cens.time)~tmt.first+risk +lqol+cluster(id),data=cat) summary(modlqol) My question is quick. I am looking at 1 event (death), an...

On 1/30/15 11:32 PM, Qiuping Yi wrote: > Hi, John Criswell > > Thank you very much. > > I am installing LLVM-3.2, but I encounter the next error when carrying > out "make": Is this error occurring when compiling the version of Clang within SAFECode or standard Clang? If it's the former, you should know that you don't need to compile SAFECode to use

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:02:18PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 05:20:14AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This is an update from v1 version. > > Changes: > > - update event suppression mechanism > > - separate options for indirect and direct s/g > > - lots of new features > > > > --- > > > > Performance

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 01:02:18PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 05:20:14AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > This is an update from v1 version. > > Changes: > > - update event suppression mechanism > > - separate options for indirect and direct s/g > > - lots of new features > > > > --- > > > > Performance

...m_buffers; > > > __le16 index; > > > __le16 flags; > > > }; > > > > Interesting. How about a benchmark for these ideas? > > Sure, I would like to benchmark it. It won't take long to me. But > currently, I was still focusing on analysising the performance behaviour > of virtio 0.95/1.0 (when I get some time), to see what's not good for > performance and what's can be improved. > > Besides that, as said, I often got interrupted. Moreoever, DPDK v17.05 > code freeze deadline is coming. So it's just a remind...

...le8 batch; > > __le8 num_buffers; > > __le16 index; > > __le16 flags; > > }; > > Interesting. How about a benchmark for these ideas? Sure, I would like to benchmark it. It won't take long to me. But currently, I was still focusing on analysising the performance behaviour of virtio 0.95/1.0 (when I get some time), to see what's not good for performance and what's can be improved. Besides that, as said, I often got interrupted. Moreoever, DPDK v17.05 code freeze deadline is coming. So it's just a remind that I may don't have...