search for: anadi

Done. Best, Anadi. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Anadi, > > Yes, this is a bug in the loop vectorizer. The loop vectorizer expects only > one loop counter (integer with step=1). There is no reason why we should > not handle the case below, and...

Just an FYI: it's often handy to mention the PR number when a thread is concluded by filing a bug. That way other people reading (now, or more importantly, later) can follow the issue through to the bug and its resolution On Apr 11, 2013 4:24 PM, "Anadi Mishra" <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > Done. > > Best, > Anadi. > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Anadi, > > > > Yes, this is a bug in the loop vectorizer. The loop vectorizer expects &...

...++; printf("a[%d] is %d", i,aa[i]); } LV runs and says "LV: Found too many inductions". I am guessing that this because some of the loop passes are missing. Could you please shed some light on what passes should be used to prepare the IR for LV? Best, Anadi On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Anadi, > > In the file PassManagerBuilder.cpp you can change the lines below to get rid of the O3 restriction. > > 189 if (LoopVectorize && OptLevel > 2) > 190 MPM.add(crea...

Hi Anadi, Yes, this is a bug in the loop vectorizer. The loop vectorizer expects only one loop counter (integer with step=1). There is no reason why we should not handle the case below, and it should be easy to fix. Interestingly enough if you reverse the order of iterations and count from SIZE to zero,...

...I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly optimises away the loop body. Any ideas would be appreciated. Best, Anadi. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130411/73bb2216/attachment.html>

Hi Anadi, In the file PassManagerBuilder.cpp you can change the lines below to get rid of the O3 restriction. 189 if (LoopVectorize && OptLevel > 2) 190 MPM.add(createLoopVectorizePass()); Nadav On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: &g...

...the suggestion Jim. I already tried to do it by 'opt' but it also requires O3. BTW I think that if I invoke 'opt' with '-vectorize-loops' option, it will figure out the passes required for LV since every pass mentions what other passes are prerequisite. Am I correct? Best, Anadi. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > You can take unoptimized bitcode and run it through ‘opt’ to have complete > flexibility in which passes get run. It may take some fiddling to find out > the pass sequence and ordering that does what y...

...rough ‘opt’ to have complete flexibility in which passes get run. It may take some fiddling to find out the pass sequence and ordering that does what you want, as some passes rely on previous passes to canonicaplize code into a form it can effectively work with. -Jim On Apr 10, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Anadi Mishra <reachanadi at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying out the LoopVectorizer(LV) pass and would like to decouple it from O3 which is currently required to run LV. I want to do this because I want to understand the behaviour of LV by trying simple loops but the O3 mostly...

...- diff[jj+4]; m2[j][5] = diff[jj+1] - diff[jj+5]; m2[j][6] = diff[jj+2] - diff[jj+6]; m2[j][7] = diff[jj+3] - diff[jj+7]; } Another question is regarding the isannotatedparallel() check. Is there a way to make clang (or any other frontend) to generate parallel annotated IR? Best, Anadi.

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 04/17/2013 04:55 AM, Anadi Mishra wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to vectorize the following loop but the vectorizer says: >> "Found a possible write-write reorder" and does not vectorize. >> Why? > > > To my knowledge, the dependence analysis in the loop vectorize...

On 04/17/2013 04:55 AM, Anadi Mishra wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to vectorize the following loop but the vectorizer says: > "Found a possible write-write reorder" and does not vectorize. > Why? To my knowledge, the dependence analysis in the loop vectorizer is not yet able to prove the absence of...

...es and resigned certifcates on master after clean up, but the puppet master still blocks it. However If I run through puppet master daemon (without nginx + passenger) all requests go through. Is there any specific configuration for Nginx host header etc or in passenger that I am missing? BR/ Anadi Misra. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/nOSFMp3o9OsJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubsc...

Hi Anadi Mishra, On 04/17/2013 05:55 AM, Anadi Mishra wrote: > Another question is regarding the isannotatedparallel() check. Is > there a way to make clang (or any other frontend) to generate parallel > annotated IR? Paul Redmond was adding support for "#pragma ivdep" that would use th...

...rt is disabled when I check logs on puppet master [root@bangvmpllDA02 logs]# tail puppet_access.log [05/Dec/2012:17:45:18 +0530] "GET /production/certificate/ca? HTTP/1.1" 404 162 "-" "Ruby" [05/Dec/2012:18:32:23 +0530] "PUT /production/certificate_request/sl63anadi.XXXXX.com HTTP/1.1" 405 166 "-" "-" [05/Dec/2012:18:33:33 +0530] "GET /production/certificate/sl63anadi.XXXXX.com? HTTP/1.1" 404 162 "-" "-" [05/Dec/2012:18:33:33 +0530] "GET /production/certificate_request/sl63anadi.XXXXX.com? HTTP/1.1...