search for: amundsen

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a > >&g...

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a > > share. The situation is like this: > > > > Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup "foo", I > > want to l...

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:57 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote...

...uot;foo". This works fine with Samba 3.x, but not with Samba 4.x. When setting owner/group to root/bar on "/test/restricted" and mode=770, access is denied for all users. What can I do to make this work with Samba 4.x? Or is this simply not possible anymore? Regards, -- Trond H. Amundsen <t.h.amundsen at usit.uio.no> Center for Information Technology Services, University of Oslo

...I know that the best way is to start again and use virtual domains and get all into one naming standard, but unfortunately, that is not going to happen. The other alternative is of course to hack into the source code of atmail, but I am not that confident in PHP. Any ideas? -- Regards Roald Amundsen

...se include me in the CC list, since I'm not a mailinglist member. PS. I really like perl's approach to module building. When building perl modules, it defaults to the same compilers as perl was initially built with. This seems like a sane approach also for R IMHO. Cheers, -- Trond Hasle Amundsen <t.h.amundsen at usit.uio.no> Center for Information Technology Services, University of Oslo

...match the if statement beginning at line 467. In addition there is probably an error in the ``switch (acct_name[0]) {'' ``default'' tag at line 502: there is a ``break'' at line 509, inside an if statement, but no break to logically end the default tag. Best Regards --J?rn Amundsen

On 10/02/16 09:41, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>>>&g...

On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >>> share. The situation is...

Hello   I have a fileserver running samba 4.9.4 that is a member in an AD. The backup tool I am using is running as a linux user that is a member of linux group 'disk'. I'd like to add the group disk to a windows AD group 'backup' which have read access to the share. I am thinking that it is easier to manage the share from one point and that being the windows tool. I have only

First of all, please direct me into how better to search existing threads in this mailing list. Ok to my rspec 2.0.1 mocha 0.9.8 issue: given a controller test before do subject.expects(:authenticate).once end it "should bla bla" do pending "PENDING, shouldn''t fail?" end with config.mock_with :rspec it''s ok: pending, but with

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:27:28 +0100 Mark Amundsen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi > > So I added a second DC with the rfc2307 option. It replicates and I > auth works. yay. > >> Does this also mean that the member server that will act as a file > >> server should have idmap config = ad? >...

>> [...] I'd like to add the group disk to a >> windows AD group 'backup' [...] > A 'local' Linux is just that, a local user, it is not a part of AD, so > it cannot be used in AD, the same goes for groups. > > You could create the user in AD and then make this user a Linux user as > well, but you will have to delete the local Linux user. > >

On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:27:29 +0100 Mark Amundsen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > Is 'idmap rid' a better choice than ad? Can I still copy files > > > with rsync in that case or will file ownership be mangled? > > > > Quantify better ? > > One isn't really bet...

I inherited an old Samba 4 server that act as both AD DC and fileserver. Hardware is old, need to be replaced. Plan is to add a second AD DC and join a new fileserver as a domain member, rsync all files from the old file server to the new and map clients to the new one and finally demote the old AD DC. The old AD DC has this line in smb.conf: idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes Because of that my

Hi So I added a second DC with the rfc2307 option. It replicates and I auth works. yay. >> Does this also mean that the member server that will act as a file >> server should have idmap config = ad? > Only if you have manually added uidNumber & gidNumber attributes to AD I belive the microsoft admin tools have always been used to add users and groups Is 'idmap

> > > > Is 'idmap rid' a better choice than ad? Can I still copy files with > > rsync in that case or will file ownership be mangled? > > Quantify better ? > One isn't really better than the other, they are both usable, but in > different ways and reasons. > It might help if you read this: > >