search for: amounts

Hello all, I would like to be able to update the "amount" of a certain item in me order list. The problem I run into is how to define the text_field element. @order is the current order, which has_many :order_item which in turn belongs_to :order. order_item has a field "amount" which should be modified... What I tried is this below, but I get a undefined method

Dear all, The following problem just has been submitted to me by an accountant. In his new job, he has to close some old accounts. He has yearly amounts, and a list of products that have been bought over the years, at certain prices for which he has an exhaustive record. The problem is: He does not know what product was bought this or that year (don't ask). He does not want to find back the real story, but just write realistic accounts, for...

I have a form that sends the following query string to my Rails controller: transaxion[category_association_attributes][][category_id]=2& transaxion[category_association_attributes][][amount]=12& transaxion[category_association_attributes][][category_id]=1& transaxion[category_association_attributes][][amount]=8 But ActionController parses it as:

Hi, This is a question of a newbie getting into the exciting world of R. I have several dataframes in the same format as NAD: > NAD[1:3,1:3] Sample.Id Main.abs..1 Main.abs..2 148 10a 0.04836 0.04994 167 11a_1109 0.32245 0.36541 173 11b_1109 0.29293 0.32815 What I want to do is to replace the Sample.Id with a corresponding number.The number

Hi Guillaume, Thanks for the RFC. I'm generally +1 on the concept. Making bit field manipulation easier seems like a good overall goal given its prevalence in LLVM. As for the syntax, I tend to prefer that we don't pollute the namespace. Have you considered pushing the methods into the Bitfield class? Maybe something like: ``` uint8_t Storage = 0; using Amount =

Comments and suggestions for improving the specifications are welcome. Thanks, Alvin One example comparing context/specify (CS) with given/when/then (GWT) with a strategy pattern follows: Consider a pipeline transporting oil supplied by multiple partners. The amounts transported on behalf of each partner are recorded as transactions in a general ledger. There are multiple approaches to allocating the pipeline operational costs to each partner: - fixed amount - equal split - fixed percentage - gross override with subsidiary cost allocation - proportio...

Hey guys, I''m having a hard time w/ the after_update callback on rails... As far as I can tell, when I define a after_update callback on a model, the attributes of the object have the same values that they had *before* Base.save was called. I''m probably wrong so here''s the code: UNIT TEST: def test_register_item_adjusts_account_balance account =

Hi, I'm new to LLVM and need some help. I defined an instruction to increment the stack pointer by 'amount' (i.e. sp = sp + amount). During assembly generation, the string that gets emitted is "ADS $SP" rather than "ADS 10", for example, if I want to increment it by 10. Can somebody show me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks. def ADS: F_J<0b100001,(outs),(ins

TL;DR: Have support in ADT for typed values packing into opaque scalar types - Code & design choices: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81580 - Usage: https://reviews.llvm.org/differential/changeset/?ref=2005337&whitespace=ignore-most - Example of rewrite: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81662 *CONTEXT* There are places in LLVM where we need to pack typed fields into opaque values. For instance,

A late friday afternoon coding question. I'm having a hard time thinking of the correct search terms for what I want to do. If I have a df like this: a <- data.frame(name=c(rep('a',10),rep('b',15)),year=c(1971:1980,1971:1985),amount=1:25) name year amount 1 a 1971 1 2 a 1972 2 3 a 1973 3 4 a 1974 4 5 a 1975 5 6 a 1976

Hi all I know about producing a minimal example to show my problem. But I'm having trouble producing a minimal example that displays this behaviour, so please bear with me to begin with. Observe: I create an array called model.mat. Some details on this: > str(model.mat) num [1:18, 1:4] -0.170 -0.304 -2.617 2.025 -1.610 ... - attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 ..$ : chr

> On Dec 5, 2018, at 22:15, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 12/05/2018 07:22 PM, m m via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm new to LLVM and need some help. I defined an instruction to increment the stack pointer by 'amount' (i.e. sp = sp + amount). During assembly generation, the string that gets emitted is "ADS $SP"

I tried to use named parameters in my SQL query , using find_by_sql Order.find_by_sql ([select * from orders where amount > ? and quantity > ?", [ @amount, @quantity ] works;.. but Order.find_by_sql ([select * from orders where amount > :amount and quantity > :quantity ", [ :amount => @amt, :quantity => @qty ] is not working a I wrong or should I use a plain select

Hi, I have had a problem report from a Recoll user about the amount of writes during index creation. https://opensourceprojects.eu/p/recoll1/tickets/67/ The issue is that the index is on SSD and that the amount of writes is significant compared to the SSD life expectancy (index size > 250 GB). >From the numbers he supplied, it seems to me that the total amount of block writes is roughly

...non-negative inputs. For negative inputs, sext will produce negative output. And interpreted as unsigned number, such negative shift amount is *always* bigger than largest legal shift amount: * i1 can only be shifted by 0 * i2 can only be shifted by 1 (positive); 2,3 (negative) are not legal shift amounts * i3 can only be shifted by 1,2 (positive); 3 (positive) and 4-7 (negative) are not legal shift amounts * i4 can only be shifted by 1,2,3 (positive); 4-7 (positive) and 8-15 (negative) are not legal shift amounts * and so on. Therefore we must not have negative shift amount (or we have UB), so we c...

Hi list, I have data in a dataframe t1, with a column for different amounts spent, a column what it was spent on, and a column with dates, from which I create a new column with months. Example: amount <- rep(c(10,20,30),3) what <- rep(c("food","books","cycling"),3) when <- c(rep("2008-09-05",5),rep("2008-10-07",...

I''m just learning Rails and have encountered a problem trying to set a field in a DB record based on the value of another form input field. Using the scaffold code, the create works as expected and the update (edit) also works. However, one of the DB fields (amount) is supposed to be computer from another (units): if the category field is "Mileage", amount= units *

I have two models, Donor and Contribution, and have has_many and belongs_to set respectively. My question is regarding creation of associated objects. I''ll let the code speak: me = Donor.find(1) contribution = me.contributions.create do |e| e.amount = 164.00 e.category = Category.find(1) end I thought this was valid, but it doesn''t work properly - it appears to

The thing is, we *don't* "not demand" those high bits. We *don't* not care what's in those bits - IR shifts don't mask their shift amounts. I.e we can't replace `x >> (32-y)` with `x >> (-y)`, which would be legal transform should we not demand those bits. We very much demand them. We just know those bits to be zero. And i'm not sure how to convey that to SimplifyDemandedBits(). I can't pass the Known down the...

Hi, I see the following is the credit scoreing in R guide : m2<-glm(formula = good_bad ~ checking + duration + history+ purpose +amount + savings + employed + installp + marital + coapp +age + other + depends + telephon + foreign +checking:amount What does checking:amount mean? Regards, Xiaobo Gu