search for: amonst

...g from the Cathedral to the Bazaar. That's the scary/unknown part. The processes can be exactly the same. I am not advocating for any process changes. It is very important to understand this. git does not impose any process changes. The differences are in barrier to entry, ability to share amonst sub-projects, ability to manage private repositories and other things we simply cannot do with svn right now. But we've had all of this discussion and it looks like we're sticking with svn. I'll deal with it. -Dave

can i use MP3 files as an IVR prompts directly without converting to .gsm format? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091010/67205e07/attachment.htm

On Sep 8, 2011, at 7:09 PM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Offline commits are useful for Chris when he is on a place without > internet access. But offline commits are a godsend for people who still > have no commit rights or for developers who are conducting a series of > "what if" experiments. If people need commit access, they should ask for it. I'm not aware of anyone who

Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> writes: > You need to separate "what is good for David" from "what is good for > the project". Encouraging decentralized development and long-lived > branches is not actually in the best interest of the project. > > I agree that there are some (quite minor IMO, like offline commits) > advantages that git can

Hi All, I've been fiddling around with various ways to estimate the popularity of R, SAS, SPSS, Stata, JMP, Minitab, Statistica, Systat, BMDP, S-PLUS, R-PLUS and Revolution R. It's not an easy task. You can see what I've come up with so far at http://r4stats.com/popularity . I'm sure people will have plenty of ideas on how to improve this, so please let me know what you think.

...rg> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba>, <mailto:samba-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/ It seems that it is sometimes necessary to install NETBUI on W2000 in order to provide file sharing amonst windows machines. I would like to avoid the necssity of using NETBUI. Anyone know why NETBUI is needed or how to configure the windows registry so NETBUI is not required? James Peterson "Integrity is the base of excellence." Return-Path: <anelson@vikinglobal.com> Delivered-To:...

...gt; From: James Peterson [mailto:jimpeter@us.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 3:09 PM > To: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: W2000, NETBUI & File shares > > > It seems that it is sometimes necessary to install NETBUI on > W2000 in order > to provide file sharing amonst windows machines. I would > like to avoid > the necssity of using NETBUI. Anyone know why NETBUI is > needed or how to > configure the windows registry so NETBUI is not required? > > James Peterson > "Integrity is the base of excellence." > -- > To unsubscri...