Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "amodule".
Did you mean:
module
2010 Jul 30
5
Parameterised Classes in 2.6.0... still no luck
....0 today, and still can''t
get parameterised classes to work. At least, I think it''s 2.6.0... the
version number in the RPM spec file says 0.25.5.
This simple example:
/etc/puppet/manifests/nodes/pax/name01.pax.xxx.com.pp:
node ''name01.pax.xxx.com'' {
class { amodule::afunc: version => "1.0" }
}
/etc/puppet/modules/amodule/manifests/afunc.pp:
class amodule::afunc ( $version ) {
file { "/tmp/foo": ensure => directory; }
}
This causes the following error to be displayed on the client:
Jul 30 03:48:45 s_sys@name01.pax.livegamer.com...
2006 Jul 27
2
accessing a variable inside a plugin
Hello,
I would like to load an Hash in my init.rb plugin file ... than I would
like to use this hash in my module ...
in my init.rb:
@anHash = load From file...
in mymodule:
module Amodule
def myFunction
#@anHash ....
end
end
How can I access to my hash in my plugin module function ?
thanks for this dummy question ;-)
Arnaud
2010 Sep 15
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM-C addition: LLVMConvertModuleToXXX
What do you guys/girls think about LLVM-C additions that are similar to the following:
char *
LLVMConvertModuleToC(LLVMModuleRef aModule);
Which creates the X-code for a given module (in this case for the language C).
- Filip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100916/2e6cc84d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part ------...
2006 Jan 05
2
Error Code 12
Hi
I am new to this list - hello all.
I think I might be re asking a well trodden question but here goes....
I have cygwin set up on a Windows XP box and intend to use rsync
(version 2.6.3) as a client to push a bunch of file to a debain (Sarge)
server.
The Debain server runs a rsync daemon (version 2.6.4).
I have set up the system to use a secrets file at both ends.
When I try to my files from
2019 Feb 01
2
[RFC] Adding thread group semantics to LangRef (motivated by GPUs)
On 31.01.19 15:59, Jan Sjodin wrote:
>> > Any transform that re-arranges control flow would potentially have to
>> > know about the properties of ballot(), and the rules with respect to
>> > the CFG (and maybe consider the target) to know where to insert the
>> > intrinsics.
>
>> But the same is true for basically any approach to handling this. In