search for: ammenities

On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Dan Gohman wrote: > For example, suppose we want to convert the && to &, and the ?: to a > select, in this code: > > if (a && (b ? (c + d) : e)) { > > because we have a CPU architecture with poor branch prediction, or > because we want more ILP, or because of some other reason. Here's what the > LLVM IR for that might

Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes: > The optimizations we're talking about are forms of safe > speculation. Doing that at IR level is fine. > > Hardware support for NaT bits + check instructions have been popping > up on this message thread. Hardware speculation exists solely to > support unsafe speculation, in which certain operations need to be >

Has anyone really looked at the costs for Astricon. But the hotel costs. $111.00 USD per night.. come on guys give me a break. I will not be staying at that hotel. I can rent a car and stay near the air port for almost half that. In addition from what I have been told their will be no shuttle service from the Airport to the hotel. Anyone else have any input on this? bkw_ PS: I'm going

On Dec 6, 2011, at 2:31 PM, David A. Greene wrote: > Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> writes: > >> The optimizations we're talking about are forms of safe >> speculation. Doing that at IR level is fine. >> >> Hardware support for NaT bits + check instructions have been popping >> up on this message thread. Hardware speculation exists solely to

On Apr 27, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote: On Apr 27, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote: >> To all, I'm moving on and accepting what appears to be the consensus of the list, for now. >> >> I want to

On Dec 5, 2011, at 4:44 PM, Paul Robinson wrote: > (If this thread is becoming tiresome, let me know. This newbie is trying to > understand some of what's going on; clearly you've thought about it way more > than I have, and I can understand if you want to stop thinking about it!) > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec

On Apr 27, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote: > To all, I'm moving on and accepting what appears to be the consensus of the list, for now. > > I want to point out something about this direction that hasn't really come up, but I think deserves some better

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Dan Gohman <dan433584 at gmail.com> wrote: > To all, I'm moving on and accepting what appears to be the consensus of > the list, for now. > I want to point out something about this direction that hasn't really come up, but I think deserves some better discussion. I don't think it should be the basis of a decision one way or the other,

(If this thread is becoming tiresome, let me know. This newbie is trying to understand some of what's going on; clearly you've thought about it way more than I have, and I can understand if you want to stop thinking about it!) On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 5, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Paul Robinson wrote: > > > > On Thu,

...el. I'm > willing to bet that the place you found for 1/2 the cost of > the Marriott is not capable of hosting a conference for 150 - 200 > people.=20 The Marriott Marquis (assume that's where it's going to be held) is a decent hotel. Plus, the upstairs bar sometimes has nice ammenities. :) > As for the shuttle service, I have spoken with the hotel > manager and she tells me we can get airport transportation > set up for $20.00 each way. (We negotiated a $5 discount off > the normal $25.) So if you want to avoid the rental car > expense, we can arrange transporta...