search for: amead

...that I can migrate my precious emails to a new service provider. And the provider that I'm considering offers low-cost virtual dedicated servers but meters usage (including RAM and CPU). One of the reasons I have question #1 is that the server name seems to be part of the email file names... amead:/home/amead> ls mail/cur | head -2 2022292282.22297_0.vulcan.rootr.net:2,S 2022312282.3225_0.vulcan.rootr.net:2,S (rootr.net <http://rootr.net> is my current provider, not my vanity domain; vulcan is the name of their mailserver) I don't know what effect this will have, if any? Thank...

On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 13:58, Alan Mead <amead at alanmead.org> wrote: > > On 8/24/2019 12:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 01:09, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming > <ceo at teo-en-ming-corp.com> wrote: > > Good afternoon from Singapore, > > According to the CentOS 8 build timeline...

Good afternoon from Singapore, According to the CentOS 8 build timeline, everything has been completed except release work. Does this mean CentOS 8 will be released soon? https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8 -----BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE----- The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs): [The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of U.S. Embassy Workers Link:

Hi All, The last time I setup bridging I used RH8. At that time, I had to patch the kernel to get bridging to work with Iptables. Does anyone have experience with RHEL3? Does the kernel need patched, how did it go? I appreciate any information, thanks! Andy

Hi, I'm using * with the latest CVS image as of this afternoon on Fedora1. I am using snom 200's with the latest firmware. When I dial the voicemail extension and try to enter my password, * does not receive the password. The console complains about not receiving the password. Also, when I try to leave voicemail messages there seems to be no talk path and the recording session times out.

Hi, I'm having trouble applying ebtables-brnf-3_vs_2.4.22.diff to 2.4.22-1.2166.nptl. Applying the patch did not go well. Can anyone help me with this? TIA. Andy Here is the output: [root@specwall linux-2.4.22-1.2166.nptl]# patch -p1 < ../ebtables-brnf-3_vs_2.4.22.diff patching file net/bridge/br_private.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway?