Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "amdilpeepholeoptim".
2013 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...Pass.h
include/llvm/Object/RelocVisitor.h include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h
lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp lib/MC/ELFObjectWriter.cpp
lib/MC/WinCOFFObjectWriter.cpp lib/Support/APFloat.cpp
lib/Support/DynamicLibrary.cpp lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUSubtarget.h
lib/Target/R600/AMDILDevice.h
lib/Target/R600/AMDILPeepholeOptimizer.cpp
lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp (and on and on)
So I assume the new message would be:
[llvm-commits] [llvm] r172358 - Remove redundant 'llvm::' qualifications
Which seems reasonable. (I think the repo prefix is helpful given that
both the Clang and LLVM lists handl...
2012 Nov 30
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
David Blaikie wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sebastian Pop wrote:
> >> Chris Lattner wrote:
> >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
> >> >
> >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG
2012 Nov 30
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sebastian Pop wrote:
>> Chris Lattner wrote:
>> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like:
>> >
>> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements.
2013 Jan 24
3
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits subject lines?
...Pass.h
include/llvm/Object/RelocVisitor.h include/llvm/Support/YAMLTraits.h lib/Analysis/ValueTracking.cpp lib/MC/ELFObjectWriter.cpp lib/MC/WinCOFFObjectWriter.cpp lib/Support/APFloat.cpp lib/Support/DynamicLibrary.cpp lib/Target/R600/AMDGPUSubtarget.h lib/Target/R600/AMDILDevice.h lib/Target/R600/AMDILPeepholeOptimizer.cpp
lib/Transforms/IPO/DeadArgumentElimination.cpp (and on and on)
So I assume the new message would be:
[llvm-commits] [llvm] r172358 - Remove redundant 'llvm::' qualifications
Which seems reasonable. (I think the repo prefix is helpful given that both the Clang and LLVM lists handl...
2012 Jul 16
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: LLVM incubation, or requirements for committing new backends
...lvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILNIDevice.cpp
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILNIDevice.h
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILNodes.td
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILOperands.td
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILPatterns.td
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILPeepholeOptimizer.cpp
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILProfiles.td
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILRegisterInfo.cpp
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILRegisterInfo.h
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILRegisterInfo.td
> llvm/trunk/lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDILSIDevice.cpp
>...